Determinants of the choice of combined modes for foreign market entry: the case of Korean firms entering into Uzbekistan

Authors

  • Dr. Wonchan Ra Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i1.380

Keywords:

entry modes, combined entry modes, Korea, Uzbekistan

Abstract

The choice of an entry mode is one of the most critical decisions for firms expanding abroad. There are a variety of foreign market entry modes such as exporting, licensing, and foreign direct investment. While many firms use only one single mode, others frequently employ multiple different combined modes for a foreign entry in a package. Mode combination can be an effective way to achieve better performance in foreign operations because of the different modes in a combination package complement each other. The topic of mode combination, however, has not yet been extensively studied theoretically and empirically. In this paper, we examine factors affecting firms’ choice between a single-mode and a combined mode by establishing hypotheses and testing them using questionnaire survey data on Korean manufacturing firms’ recent entry into Uzbekistan.

Author Biography

Dr. Wonchan Ra, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

Professor,

Division of Global Business & Technology;

Department of International Business,

Graduate School,

Hankuk University of Foreign Studies

References

Agarwal, S. & Ramaswami, S. N. (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490257

Ahsan, M. & Musteen, M. (2011). Multinational enterprises’ entry mode strategies and uncertainty: A review and extension. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(4), 376-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00296.x

Allison, P. D. (1999). Multiple Regression: A Primer. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Pine Forge Press.

Anderson, E. & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A transaction cost analysis and proposition. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490432

Ang, S. H., Benischke, & Doh, J. P. (2015), The interactions of institutions on foreign market entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1535-1553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2295

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

Benito, G. R. G., Petersen, B. & Welch, L. S. (2011). Mode combinations and international operations: Theoretical issues and an empirical investigation. Management International Review, 51(6), 803-820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0101-4

Benito, G. R. G., Petersen, B. & Welch, L. S. (2009). Towards more realistic conceptualizations of foreign operation modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1455-1470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.54

Benito, G. R. G. & Welch, L. C. (1994). Foreign market servicing: Beyond choice of entry mode. Journal of International Marketing, 2(2), 7-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X9400200202

Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491013

Bruneel, J. & De Cock, R. (2016). Entry mode research and SMEs: A review and future research agenda. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(S1), 135-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12291

Buckley, P. J. (1988). The limits of explanation: Testing the internalization theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(2), 181-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490382

Canabal, A. & White III, G. O. (2008). Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review, 17(3), 267-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.01.003

Caves, R. E. & Mehra, S. K. (1986). Entry of Foreign Multinationals into the US Manufacturing Industries. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press.

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x

Contractor, F. J. (1984). Strategies for structuring joint ventures: A negotiations planning paradigm. Columbia Journal of World Business, 19(2), 30-39.

Contractor, F. J. (2001). Foreign market entry strategies. In R. L. Tung (Ed). The IEBM Handbook of International Business, 141-163. London, UK: Thomson Learning.

Contractor, F. J. & Ra, W. (2000). Negotiating alliance contracts: Strategy and behavioral effects of alternative compensation alternatives. International Business Review, 9(3), 271-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(00)00002-0

Geringer. J. M., Beamish, P. W. & daCosta, R. C. (1989). Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance. Strategic Management Journal, 10(2), 109-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100202

Hashai, N., Asmussen, C. G., Benito, G. R. G. & Petersen, B. (2010). Technological knowledge intensity and entry mode diversity. Management International Review, 50(6), 659-681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-010-0059-7

Hennart, J. F. (1989). Transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090406

Hennart, J. F. & Slagen, A. H. (2015). Yes, we need more entry mode studies! A commentary on Shaver. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 114-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.39

Herrmann, P. & Datta, D. K. (2006). CEO experiences: Effects on the choice of FDI entry modes. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 755-778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00610.x

Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P. & Kim, W. C. (1990). An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 117-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110204

Hymer, S. (1960). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press (published in 1976).

Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm - a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676

Kogut, B. & Singh, H. (1998). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394

Kostova, T. & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1580441

Lall, S. (1980), Monopolistic advantages and foreign involvement by U.S. manufacturing industry. Oxford Economic Papers, 32(1), 102-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041464

Laufs, K. & Schwens, C. (2014). Foreign market entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Business Review, 23(6), 109-1126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.03.006

Pan, Y. & Tse, D. K. (2000). The hierarchical model of market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(4), 535-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490921

Pehrsson, A. (2008), Strategy antecedents of modes of entry into foreign markets. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 132-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.032

Petersen, B. & Welch, L. S. (2002). Foreign operation mode combinations and internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 5(2), 157-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00151-X

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York, NY, USA: The Free Press.

Root, F. R. (1987). Entry Strategies for International Markets. Lexington, MA, USA: Lexington Books.

Schellenberg, M., Harker, M. J. & Jafari, A. (2018). International entry mode – a systematic literature review. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 26(7), 601-627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2017.1339114

Shen, Z., Puig, F. & Paul, J. (2017). Foreign Market entry mode research: A review and research agenda. International Trade Journal, 31(5), 429-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2017.1361368

Surdu, I., Mellahi, K. & Glaister, K. (2018). Emerging market multinationals’ international equity-based entry mode strategies: Review of theoretical foundations and future directions. International Marketing Review, 35(2): 342-359.

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2

UzReport (1999-2015). Uzbekistan News. http://uzreport.uz/?lan=e

Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/466942

Wulff, J. D. (2016). A systematic assessment of empirical research on foreign entry mode. European Journal of Management, 50(5-6), 942-972.

Yan, A. & Gray, B. (1994). Bargaining power, management control, and performance in United States-China joint ventures: A comparative case study. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1478-1517.

Published

2020-03-14

How to Cite

Ra, W. (2020). Determinants of the choice of combined modes for foreign market entry: the case of Korean firms entering into Uzbekistan. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 7(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i1.380