Factors affecting the choice of equity-based mode by Foreign firms entering Kazakhstan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i2.233Keywords:
Foreign market entry mode, Equity-based entry mode, Joint venture, Wholly-owned subsidiary, Kazakhstan.Abstract
Choice of modes is a critical decision that firms conducting equity-based foreign direct investment must make since it has a significant effect on performance. Entry mode choice has been a major topic in international business research up to now. As the largest country in size in Central Asia and a large economic potential, Kazakhstan became one of the main destinations for foreign direct investment in this area while transitioning to a market-based economy after gaining independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. This paper investigates the main firm- and country-specific factors that affect the choice of equity-based entry modes of foreign investors entering Kazakhstan between a joint venture (JV) and a wholly-owned subsidiary (WOS). We establish hypotheses regarding the effects of such factors on the mode choice and empirically test the hypotheses with secondary data on foreign companies’ entry in Kazakhstan, using binomial logit regression analysis.
References
Agar, M. (1994). Language Shock, Understanding the Culture of Conversation. New York: Quill.
Agarwal, S. (1994). Socio-cultural distance and the choice of joint ventures: A contingency perspective. Journal of International Marketing, 2(2), 63-80.
Agarwal, S. and Ramaswani, S. N. (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23, 1-27.
Ahlquist, J. and Prakash, A. (2009). FDI and the cost of contract enforcement in developing countries. Policy Sciences, 43, 181-200.
Anderson, E. and Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: A Transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26.
Andersson, T. and Svensson, R. (1994). Entry modes for direct investment determined by the composition of firm-specific skills. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 96, 551-560.
Antal-Mokos, Z. (1998). Privatization, Politics, and Economic Performance in Hungary, Cambridge: CUP.
Arslan A., and Larimo J. (2011). Greenfield investments or acquisitions: Impacts of institutional distance on establishment mode choice of multinational enterprises in emerging economies. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(4), 345-356.
Aulakh, P. S. and Kotabe, M. (1997). Antecedents and performance of channel integration in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 145-175.
Baigabylova, N. (2012). Internationalization of production in Kazakhstan and its economic implications: The role of foreign investment and transnational corporations. Department of Economic History. Lund University.
Barbosa, N., Guimaraes, P. and Woodward, D. (1998). Foreign firm entry in Portugal: An application of event count models. 25th Annual EARIE Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Barkema, H. G. and Vermeulen, F. (1998). International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 7-26.
Boyacigiller, N. A., Goodman, R. A. and Phillips, M. E. (2004). Crossing Cultures: Insights from Master Teachers. New York, NY: Routledge.
Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 203-221.
Canabal, A. and White III, G.O. (2008). Entry mode research: Past and future. International Business Review, 17(3): 267-284.
Chang, S. J. and Rosenzweig, P.M. (2001). The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal, 22(8), 747-776.
Chiao, Y. C., Lo, F. Y. and Yu, C. M. (2010). Choosing between wholly?owned subsidiaries and joint ventures of MNCs from an emerging market. International Marketing Review, 27(3), 338?365.
Chuck, K. and Tadesse, S. (2006). The MNC as an agent of change for host-country institutions: FDI and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 767-785.
Cleeve, E. (1997). The Motives for joint ventures: A transaction costs analysis of Japanese MNEs in the UK. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 44(1), 31–43.
Contractor, F. J. (1990). Ownership patterns for U.S. joint ventures abroad and the liberalization of foreign government regulations in the 1980s: Evidence from the benchmark surveys. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 55–73.
Coase, R.H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386-405.
Contractor, F. J. (2001). Foreign market entry strategies. In R. L. Tung (Ed) The IEBM Handbook of International Business, 141-163. London, UK: Thomson Learning.
Dalrymple, R. (2014). The Impact of the Eurasian Customs Union on Foreign Direct Investment in Kazakhstan. MA Thesis, University of Washington.
Davidson, W. H. and McFetridge, D. G. (1985). Key characteristics in the choice of international technology transfer mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 16(2), 5-21.
Davis, P. S., Desai, A. B. and Francis, J. D. (2000). Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 239-258.
Delios, A. and Beamish, P. W. (1999). Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 915-933.
Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E. and Glaister, K. W. (2007). Dimensions of European direct investment activity in Turkey: Patterns and prospects. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2(3), 274–297.
Dikova, D. and Witteloostuijn, A. (2005). Acquisition versus greenfield foreign entry: Diversification mode choice in Central and Eastern Europe. Working Paper, University of Groningen.
Dikova, D. and Witteloostuijn, A. (2007). Foreign direct investment mode choice: Entry and establishment modes in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 1013–1033.
Dreher, A., Kotsogiannis, C. and McCorriston, S. (2007). Corruption around the world: Evidence from a structural model. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(3), 443-466.
Duanmu, J. L. (2011). The effect of corruption distance and market orientation on the ownership choice of MNEs: Evidence from China. Journal of International Management, 17(2), 162-174.
El Said, H. and McDonald, F. (2002). Institutional reform and entry mode by foreign firms: The case of Jordan. Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development and Transition, 6, 76-88.
Ericson, R. E. (1991). The classical Soviet-type economy: Nature of the system and implications for reform. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(4), 11-27.
Erramilli M. K. and D'Souza, D. E. (1995). Uncertainty and foreign direct investment: The role of moderators. International Marketing Review, 12(3), 47-60.
Erramilli, M. K. (1996). Nationality and subsidiary ownership patterns in multinational corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2), 225-248.
Erramilli, M. K. (1990). Entry mode choice in service industries. International Marketing Review, 7(5), 50-62.
Estrin, S., Jan, H., Evzen, K. and Jan, S. (2007). Effects of privatization and ownership in transition economies. University of Michigan International Policy Center Working Paper, 30.
Estrin, S., Poukliakova, S. and Shapiro, D. (2009). The performance effects of business groups in Russia. Journal of Management Studies, 46(2), 393-420
Franko, L. G. (1989). Use of minority and 50–50 joint ventures by United States multinationals during the 1970s: The interaction of host country policies and corporate strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(1), 19-40.
Gatignon, H. and Anderson, E. (1988). The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: An empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4(2), 305-336.
Gomes-Casseres, B. (1989). Ownership structures of foreign subsidiaries: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 11(1), 1–25.
Gomes-Casseres, B. (1990). Firm ownership preferences and host government restrictions: An integrated approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 1–22.
Guiso, L., Sapienza, L. and Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1095-1131.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hennart, J. F. (1991). A Transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures: An empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, 37(4), 483-497.
Hennart, J. F. and Larimo, J. (1998). The Impact of culture on the strategy of multinational enterprises: Does national origin affect ownership decisions. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 515–538.
Hennart, J.-F. and Park, Y. R. (1993). Greenfield vs. acquisition: The strategy of Japanese investors in the United States. Management Science, 39, 1054-1070.
Hennart, J.-F. & Slangen, A. H. L. 2015. Yes, we really do need more entry mode studies! A commentary on Shaver. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 114-122.
Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. CA: Sage.
Ionascu, D., Meyer, K. E. and Estrin, S. (2004). Institutional distance and international business strategies in emerging economies. William Davidson Institute (WDI) - Working Paper, 728.
Kaynak, E., Demirbag, M., and Tatoglu, E. (2007). Determinants of ownership based entry mode choice of MNEs: Evidence from Mongolia. Management International Review, 47(4), 505–530.
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K. (2000). The future of business groups in emerging markets: Long-run evidence from Chile. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 268-285.
Kim, W. C. and Hwang, P. (1992). Global strategy and multinationals’ entry mode choice, Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 29–54.
Kogut, B. and Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.
Kornai, J. (1992). The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kumar, N. (1994). Determinants of export orientation of foreign production by U.S. multinationals: An intercountry analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 141-156.
Kwon, Y. C. and Konopa, L. J. (1993). Impact of host country market characteristics on the choice of foreign market entry mode. International Marketing Review, 10(1), 60–76.
Larimo, J. (2003). Form of investment by Nordic Firms in world markets. Journal of Business Research, 56(10), 791–803.
Luo, Y. (2001). Determinants of entry in an emerging economy: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management Studies, 38(3), 443-472.
Luo, Y. and Park, S. H. (2001). Strategic alignment and performance of market-seeking MNCs in China. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 141-155.
Luo, Y. and Shenkar, O. (2006). The multinational corporation as a multilingual community: Language and organization in a global context. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 321-339.
Meyer, K. E. (2001). The institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business, 32(2), 357-367
Mutinelli, M. and Piscitello, L. (1998). The influence of firm’s size and international experience on the ownership structure of Italian FDI in manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 11(1), 43?56.
Nordstrom, K. and Vahlne, J. E. (1994). Is the globe shrinking? Psychic distance and the establishment of Swedish sales subsidiaries during the last 100 years. In M. Landeck (Ed.), International Trade: Regional and Global issues: 41–56. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
Norusis, M. J. (1994). SPSS Advanced Statistics 6.1. Chicago, Illinois: SPSS Inc.
Oleynik, I. S. (2002). Kazakhstan: Country Study Guide. Washington, DC: International Business Publications.
Oxley, J. E. (1999). Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: The impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 38, 283-309.
Padmanabhan, P. and Cho, K. R. (1999). Decision specific experience in foreign ownership and establishment strategies: Evidence from Japanese firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(1), 25-44.
Pan, Y. (1996). Influences on foreign equity ownership level in joint ventures in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(1), 1–26.
Pan, Y. and Chi, P. S. K. (1999). Financial performance and survival of multinational corporations in China. Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 359-374.
Peng, M. W. (1994). Organizational changes in planned economies in transition: An eclectic model. Advances in International Comparative Management, 9, 223-251.
Peng, M. W. (2009). Global Strategy. Singapore: South Western Cengage Learning.
Ronen, S. and Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 435-454.
Root, F. R. (1987). Entry Strategies for International Markets. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Scott, W.R. (2008). Crafting analytic framework I: Three pillars of institutions in Institutions and organizations (3rd edn), Ch.3: 47-71. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage.
Shaver, J. M. 2013. Do we really need more entry mode studies? Journal of International Business Studies, 44(1): 23-27.
Slangen, A. H. L. and van Tulder, R. J. M. (2009). Cultural distance, political risk, or governance quality? Towards a more accurate conceptualization and measurement of external uncertainty in foreign entry mode research. International Business Review, 18, 276-291.
Sun, H. (1999). FDI, foreign trade and transfer pricing. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29(3), 362-382.
Swaan, W. (1997). Knowledge, Transaction Costs and the Creation of Markets in Post-Socialist Economies, Vol. II. London and New York: Routledge.
Tekin-Koru, A. (2006). Corruption and the ownership composition of the multinational firm at the time of entry: evidence from Turkey. Journal of Economics and Finance, 30(2), 251-269.
Thornton, J. and Mikheeva, N. N. (1996). The Strategies of foreign and foreign-assisted firms in the Russian Far East: Alternatives to missing infrastructure. Comparative Economic Studies, 38(4), 85-120.
Trevino, L. J. and Mixon, F. G. (2004). Strategic factors affecting foreign direct investment decisions by multinational enterprises in Latin America. Journal of World Business, 39(2), 233-243.
Transparency International (2017). https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_ 2017#table(accessed July 1, 2018)
Tseng, C. H. and Lee, R. P. (2010. Host environmental uncertainty and equity?based entry mode dilemma, The role of market linking capability. International Business Review, 19, 407-418.
Tugut, M. and Lee, C. Y. (2007). Doing business in Kazakhstan: Opportunities, challenges, and suggestions. The Journal of Global Business Management, 3(1), 109-119.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (various issues). World Investment Report. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
Werner, S. (2002). Recent developments in international management research: A review of 20 top management journals. Journal of Management, 28(3), 277-305.
West, J. and Graham, J. L. (2004). A linguistic-based measure of cultural distance and its relationship to managerial values. Management International Review, 44(3), 239-260.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies Analysis and antitrust implications organization.. New York, NY, USA: Free Press.
World Bank. (1996). World Development Report: From Plan to Market. Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.
World Bank. (1993). Kazakhstan: The Transition to a Market Economy. Washington, DC.
World Bank. (2014). Doing Business: Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium-Size Enterprises. Retrieved from http://doingbusiness.org
Wu, S. (2006). Corruption and cross-border investment by multinational firms. Journal of Comparative Economics. 34, 839-856.
Xu, D. and Shenkar, O. (2002). Institutional distance and the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 608-618.
Xu, D., Pan, Y. and Beamish, P. W. (2004). The effect of regulative and normative distances on MNE ownership and expatriate strategies. Management International Review, 44(3), 285-307.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.
