Outcome of capital investment on labor productivity in agriculture sector of Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i1.355Keywords:
productivity of labor, agriculture, investment, fixed capital, employee, economic growth.Abstract
Ukraine's agricultural sector accounts for 17% of the country's GDP and is continuously growing. For six consecutive years (2013-2018), Ukraine harvested over 60 million tons of grain annually, and 2018 export of ag commodities reached $18.6 billion. (State, 2020). The anticipated land reform envisions lifting the moratorium on the agricultural land sale, which should encourage capital investments in ag. The article analyzes the trends of investment opportunities in the Ukrainian ag sector for the last decade. The regression analysis of labor productivity with variables of fixed capital-worker ratio and yield of grain confirmed that the function of labor productivity depended on the value of fixed capital per worker. As the U.S. investment in ag machinery export to Ukraine plays a significant role, we evaluated its effect on the current level of labor productivity in the Ukrainian agribusiness, comparing it with the U.S. farming outcome.
References
Agricultural Statistics 2017, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistical Service. Washington DC: United States government printing office, 512 p. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Ag_Statistics/2017/Complete%20Ag%20Stats%202017.pdf/. Date of access: 17.06.2019.
Agriculture of Ukraine 2017. (2018): Statistical Yearbook. Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine.
Alston, J.M., Beddow, J.B., & Pardey, P.G. (2009). Agricultural Research, Productivity, and Food Prices in the Long Run, Science 325, 4. 1209-1210.
Blanco, C. & Raurichy, X. (2018). Agricultural Composition, Structural Change and Labor Productivity. Meeting Papers of Society of Economic Dynamics. https://economicdynamics.org/meetpapers/2018/paper_772.pdf. Date of access: 14.08.2019.
Census of Agriculture 2017. United States. Summary and States DATA (2019). Volume 1 / USDA, Sonny Perdue/ NASS, Hubert Hammer. Washington DC, 2019. Retrieved June 17, 2019 from. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_US/usv1.pdf/. Date of access: 17.06.2019.
Chen, C., Restuccia, D., & Santaeulàlia-Llopis, R. (2019). The Effects of Land Markets on Resource Allocation and Agricultural Productivity. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Papers Series. http://www.nber.org/papers/w24034. Date of access: 17.12.2019.
Cobb, C. W. & Douglas, P.H. (1928) A Theory of Production. American Economic Review, 18 (1), 139-168.
Diyesperov, V. (2003). Productivity of Labor in Agriculture. Economy of Ukraine. 11, 61-68. (Original work written in Ukrainian).
FAO (2018). Transforming food and agriculture to achieve the SDGs. 20 interconnecting actions to guide decision-makers. Technical Reference Document. Rome. 132 p.
FAO (2012). The State of food and agriculture. Investing in agriculture for a better future. Rome. 182 p.
FAO (2019). Food Price Index. http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/foodpricesindex/en/. Date of access: 18.06.2019.
Fuglie, K., MacDonald, J. M., & Ball, V. E. (2007). Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture. USDA-ERS Economic Brief No. 9. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1084980 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1084980 Date of access: 18.06.2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1084980
Herrendorf, B. & Schoellman, T. (2015). Why is measured productivity so low in agriculture? Review of Economic Dynamics, 18 (4), 1003-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2014.10.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2014.10.006
Iscan, T.B. Allocative Inefficiency and Sectoral Allocation of Labor: Evidence from U.S. Structural Transformation. Dalhousie University, Working Paper #2012.02. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267797908_Allocative_Inefficiency_and_Sectoral_Allocation_of_Labor_Evidence_From_US_Structural_Transformation. Date of access: 18.12.2019.
Kawagoe, T., Hayami, Yu., & Ruttan, V. W.(1985). The intercountry agricultural production function and productivity differences among countries. Journal of Development Economics, 19(1-2). 113-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(85)90041-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(85)90041-0
Lupenko, Yu.O. & Zakharchuk, O.V. (2018). Investment provision of innovative development of Ukrainian agriculture, Ekonomika APK, 11, 9-18. (Original work written in Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201811009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201811009
OECD. Trends in agricultural productivity and sustainability performance http://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/agricultural-productivity-and-innovation/. Date of access: 13.03.2019.
Restuccia, D. (2016). Resource Allocation and Productivity in Agriculture. https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/diegor/research/Restuccia_ResAlloc_Oxford.pdf. Date of access: 13.08.2019.
Restuccia, D. & Rogerson, R. (2013). Misallocation and productivity. Review of Economic Dynamics, 16 (1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2012.11.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2012.11.003
Restuccia, D., Yang & D.T., Zhu, X. (2008). Agricultural and aggregate productivity: a quantitative cross-country analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 55 (2), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.11.006. Date of access: 13.03.2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.11.006
Schultz, T.W. (1956). Reflection on Agricultural Production, Output and Supply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 38 (3), 748–762. https://doi.org/10.2307/1234459 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1234459
State Fiscal Service of Ukraine. (2020). http://sfs.gov.ua/ms/f11
Schultz, T.W. (1945). Agriculture in Unstable Economy. New York, McGraw Hill. 299p.
United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2015). Document of the United Nations General Assembly. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/L.1&Lang=E/. Date of access: 21.03.2019.
Vitvitsky V.V. & Avramenko Yu.O .(2018). Productivity and competitiveness management in agrarian enterprises in the context of socio-economic development goals. Ekonomika APK, 5, 100-109. (Original work written in Ukrainian).
Vitvitskyi, V.V. (2018). Institutional environment of productivity’s management in the agrarian sector of the economy. Ekonomika APK, 8, 107-115. (Original work written in Ukrainian).
Wang, S.L., Paul Heisey, P., Schimmelpfennig D., & Ball, E. (2015). Agricultural Productivity Growth in the United States: Measurement, Trends, and Drivers, ERR-189, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, July 2015. https://ethanolrfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Agricultural-Productivity-Growth-in-the-US_Wang-et-al_2015.pdf/. Date of access: 21.05.2019.
Yasmin, T., El Refae, G., & Eletter, S. (2019). Sectoral productivity in Hungarian economy: an input-output linkages approach. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 6 (2), 344-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v6i2.318
Zadorozhna, L. (2014). Forming Agro Industries Clusters for Reaching Competitiveness of Ukrainian Agroindustrial Sector. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 1 (1), 2-11.
Zakharchuk, O.V. (2019). Technical maintenance of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine. Ekonomika APK, 2, 48-56. (Original work written in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201902048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201902048
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.