Innovation development of small business in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i6.1511Keywords:
Innovation Development, Interactive Process, Knowledge Exploitation, Knowledge IntensiveAbstract
This study examines the factors influencing innovation development in small businesses in Indonesia across various sectors. Innovation is widely recognized as a critical factor in the competitiveness of businesses. This development potential is essential for the entrepreneurs who participated in the questionnaire survey. In fact, out of a total of 85.50% of them are already currently running a business, and they also consider innovation very important. A sample of 400 small business owners was analyzed using descriptive analysis to identify eight factors related to innovation development, including knowledge exploitation, interactive processes, knowledge-intensive business process improvement, new technology-based firms, go-to-market strategies, stricter regulation, and stimulation. The results revealed that three factors were particularly dominant in innovation development. Specifically, knowledge exploitation was strongly correlated with knowledge-intensive, while interactive processes were strongly correlated with knowledge exploitation. Finally, knowledge-intensive was strongly related to knowledge exploitation. These findings underscore the importance of knowledge and interaction in driving innovation among small businesses in Indonesia. By prioritizing these dominant factors, small businesses can develop strategies to remain competitive in a rapidly evolving business environment.
References
Abdul-Halim, H., Ahmad, N. H., Geare, A., & Thurasamy, R. (2018). Innovation Culture in SMEs: The Importance of Organizational Culture, Organizational Learning, and Market Orientation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0014
Aureli, S., Giampaoli, D., Ciambotti, M., & Bontis, N. (2018). Key factors that improve knowledge-intensive business processes which lead to competitive advantage. Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0168 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0168
Babenko, V., Pravotorova, O., Yefremova, N., Popova, S., Kazanchuk, I., & Honcharenko, V. (2020). The Innovation Development in China in the Context of Globalization. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 17, 523–531. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2020.17.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2020.17.51
Camargo, M., Morel, L., & Lhoste, P. (2021). Progressive University Technology Transfer of Innovation Capabilities to SMEs: An Active and Modular Educational Partnership. In D. Mietzne & C. Schultz (Eds.), New Perspectives in Technology Transfer (pp. 245–267). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61477-5_11
Chochole, T. (2022). Key Competencies As a Tool of Designers Interdisciplinary Cooperation in Digital Age. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 17(4), 2346–2361.http://hdl.handle.net/11025/51492
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. In Megan O’Heffernan (Ed.), SAGE Publications, Inc (Fifth Edit). SAGE. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/scp
Dixit, P. M., J.C.A.M.Buijs, H.M.W.Verbeek, & Aalst, W. M. P. van der. (2018). Fast incremental conformance analysis for interactive process discovery. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 320, pp. 163–175). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93931-5_12
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., León, R., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2022). Global Innovation Index 2022. In WIPO (Issue 8.5.2017). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/autism-spectrum-disorders
Gamidullaeva, L. (2018). Towards combining the innovation ecosystem concept with intermediary approach to regional innovation development. MATEC Web of Conferences, 6(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821209017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/150
Global Innovation Index. (2021). Tracking innovation Trought the COVID-19 Crisis. In World Intellectual Property Organization (Issue June). www.globalinnovationindex.org
Gonzalez, R. V. D., & Melo, T. M. de. (2018). The effects of organization context on knowledge exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business Research, 90, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.025
Granata, J., Aytaç, B., & Roubaud, D. (2019). Innovation developments in the wine industry: A journey from the amphorae of old to the California wine cluster. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 36(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2019.097742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2019.097742
Hamdani, N. A., Ridwan, M., Maulani, G. A. F., & Permana, I. (2022). Analysis of Intervening Variables of New Product Performance affected by Tacit Knowledge and Strategic Flexibility. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 12(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix.2022.v12i3.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22441/jurnal_mix.2022.v12i3.002
Hamdani, N. A., & Susilawati, W. (2018). Application of information system technology and learning organization to product innovation capability and its impact on business performance of leather tanning industry. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13661
Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Boronat-Moll, C., & Estelles-Miguel, S. (2020). SME open innovation for process development: Understanding process-dedicated external knowledge sourcing. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(2), 409–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1680072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1680072
Kiron, K. R., & Kannan, K. (2018). Innovation capability for sustainable development of SMEs: An interpretive structural modelling methodology for analysing the interactions among factors. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 15(4), 514–535. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2018.090467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2018.090467
Malerba, F., & McKelvey, M. (2020). Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship integrating Schumpeter, evolutionary economics, and innovation systems. Small Business Economics, 54(2), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0060-2
McDowell, W. C., Peake, W. O., Coder, L., & Harris, M. L. (2018a). Building small firm performance through intellectual capital development: Exploring innovation as the “black box.” Journal of Business Research, 88, 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.025
McDowell, W. C., Peake, W. O., Coder, L., & Harris, M. L. (2018b). Building small firm performance through intellectual capital development: Exploring innovation as the “black box.” Journal of Business Research, 88, 321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.025
Mellett, S., Kelliher, F., & Harrington, D. (2018). Network-facilitated green innovation capability development in micro-firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(6), 1004–1024. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-11-2017-0363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-11-2017-0363
Permana, I., Hamdani, N. ., & Mubarok, T. M. . (2020). Inovation Platform: A Study On Donors At Kitabisa.com. Asia Pasific Management Reaserch Conference (APMRC 2019), 206–207. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200812.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200812.035
Pratono, A. H. (2018). Network structure and open innovation: The role of trust in product development. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 15(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2018.088467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2018.10009021
Raghuvanshi, J. (2020). Revitalization of Indian SMEs for sustainable development through innovation. Business Strategy and Development, 3(4), 461–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.109
Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental Research Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Holt Rinehart & Winston.
Setiawan, R., Hamdani, N. A., Solihat, A., Mubarok, T. M. S., Nugraha, S., Maulani, G. A. F., & Permana, I. (2020). Does entrepreneurial knowledge affect self-efficacy and impact on entrepreneurial interest? International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(12), 563–582.
Smith, M. A. B., Youmans, R. J., Bellows, B. G., & Matthew S. Peterson. (2013). Shifting the Focus: An Objective Look at Design Fixation. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, User Experience, and Usability (Issue July, p. 144). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49760-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39229-0_17
UKM, K. (2019). Perkembangan Data Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Menengah dan Besar Tahun 2018-2019. Kementerian Koperasi Dan Usaha Kecil Menegah Republik Indonesia. https://kemenkopukm.go.id/uploads/laporan/1650868533_SANDINGAN_DATA_UMKM_2018-2019.pdf
Yew, J. L. K. (2021). Family Firms, Enterprise Development and Tacit Knowledge Transformation: Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Innovation in Malaysia. Global Business Review, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211047648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211047648
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Intan Permana, Tomas Chochole, Nizar Alam Hamdani; Retno Purwani Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.
