Understanding organizational resilience: A cross-country analysis of factors influencing organizational mortality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v11i5.1491Keywords:
cross-country analysis, organizational mortality, organizational resilience, morphological factors, social factors, economic factors, organizational factors, organizational ecologyAbstract
This study delves into organizational resilience by investigating the factors contributing to organizational mortality, with a focus on the interplay between internal (endogenous) and external (exogenous) influences. Drawing on concepts from organizational ecology, the research seeks to provide a clearer understanding of how these factors impact the survival and adaptability of organizations. The study employs advanced techniques such as data mining, multiple linear regression, and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARSplines) to analyze both stimulators and inhibitors of organizational mortality. The findings reveal that internal factors, particularly organizational size, significantly increase mortality risks. This research offers a holistic approach by integrating insights from organizational ecology, finance, and management, providing a comprehensive view of how various factors interact to influence organizational resilience. It highlights the importance of understanding the non-linear and dynamic relationships between these factors over time, offering valuable insights for managers and strategists who aim to strengthen organizational survival. While the findings offer important implications, further research is recommended to validate the results and deepen our understanding of organizational mortality and resilience dynamics.
References
Aldrich, H. E., & Wiedenmayer, G. (1993). From Traits to Rates: An Ecological Perspective on Organizational Foundings. In book: Seminal Ideas for the Next Twenty-Five Years of Advances. Publisher: JAI Press, pp.145-195. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-754020190000021010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-754020190000021010
Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (2001). Organizational environments and industry exit: The effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 675-711. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.3.675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.3.675
Audia, P. G., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science, 52(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0446
Baum, J. A., & Singh, J. V. (1994). Organizational niches and the dynamics of organizational mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 346-380. https://doi.org/10.1086/230540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/230540
Brunsman, K. J., & Sharfman, M. P. (1993, August). Strategic choices and niche movements: a probabilistic model of organizational selection and mortality. In Academy of Management Proceedings, 1993(1), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1993.10315156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1993.10315156
Carmeli, A., & Markman, G. D. (2011). Capture, governance, and resilience: Strategy implications from the history of Rome. Strategic Management Journal, 32(3), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.880
Carley, K. M. (1997). Organizational adaptation. Annals of Operations Research, 75(0), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018963630536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018963630536
Do, H., Budhwar, P., Shipton, H., Nguyen, H. D., & Nguyen, B. (2022). Building organizational resilience, innovation through resource-based management initiatives, organizational learning and environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 141, 808-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.090
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business research, 13(1), 215-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among US semiconductor ventures, 1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 504-529. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393315
Flamholtz, E. G., & Aksehirli, Z. (2000). Organizational success and failure:: an empirical test of a holistic model. European Management Journal, 18(5), 488-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00038-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00038-4
Greve, H. R. (2011). Positional rigidity: Low performance and resource acquisition in large and small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 32(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.875 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.875
Haarhaus, T., & Liening, A. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120033
Hannan, M. T. (1998). Rethinking age dependence in organizational mortality: Logical formalizations. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 126-164. https://doi.org/10.1086/210004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/210004
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 929-964. https://doi.org/10.1086/226424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/226424
Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2021). Organizational resilience: a valuable construct for management research? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 7-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12239
Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017). Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12076
Kotenko, S., Shvindina, H., & Heiets, I. (2021). The impact of migration on the competitiveness of the region and industry development. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 307, p. 02003). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130702003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130702003
O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.
Preisendörfer, P., & Voss, T. (1990). Organizational mortality of small firms: The effects of entrepreneurial age and human capital. Organization Studies, 11(1), 107-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840690011001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069001100109
Thornhill, S., White, R. E., & Raynor, M. E. (2021) Risky business: How strategy relates to survival. The Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 38, 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1609
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hanna Shvindina, Olha Kuzmenko, Stanislav Kotenko, Svitlana Kolomiiets
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.
