Cross-Country Analysis of Competitiveness Towards Innovation Potential Assessment for Industrials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i2.711Keywords:
analysis, subindex, competitiveness, industrials, machine-building, cross-country analysis, bibliometric analysis, innovation potentialAbstract
The global competitiveness report reveals cross-regional and cross-country disparities, and the innovation development of industrials shows how difficult it is to build and support competitiveness at a high level and increase innovation potential. The bibliometric analysis proves the diversity of the studies in the field and the increasing trend in paper production. The lack of understanding of the link between different levels of competitiveness and the need to monitor and forecast innovative development necessitated the cross-country benchmarking of industrials' innovation potential. The offered methodology is a seven-stage algorithm of innovation potential assessment, based on an existing GCI methodology modified to reveal innovation development differences, and tendencies for particular industries. The ranking was performed for major industrial countries to reveal the gaps in innovative activities and develop catch-up strategies.
References
Artyukhova, N., Hordiienko, V., Motrechko, V., & Kasian, S. (2021). Knowledge marketing: M4I-mix model of evaluation. E3S Web Conference, 307, 03002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130703002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130703002
Barzotto, M., Corò, G., Mariotti, I. & Mutinelli, ?. (2019). Ownership and workforce composition: a counterfactual analysis of foreign multinationals and Italian uni-national firms. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46, 581-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00114-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00114-0
Bayar, G. (2017). Estimating export equations: a survey of the literature. Empirical Economics, 54, 629-672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1220-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1220-3
Bilan, Y., Pimonenko, T., & Starchenko, L. (2020). Sustainable business models for innovation and success: Bibliometric analysis. Paper presented at the E3S Web of Conferences, 159 doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202015904037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015904037
Carayannis, E. & Papadopoulos, Ch. (2011). The Innovation Diplomacy Concept and the Hellenic-American Innovation Bridge as a Special Case-in-Point. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, 257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0056-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-011-0056-5
Carlsson, B., Eliasson, G. & Sjöö K. (2018). The Swedish industrial support program of the 1970s revisited. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28, 805-835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0581-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0581-5
Ciborowski, R. & Skrodzka, I. (2020). International technology transfer and innovative changes adjustment in EU. Empirical Economics, 59, 1351-1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01683-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01683-8
De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0017
Edquist, C. (2001, June). The Systems of Innovation Approach and Innovation Policy: An account of the state of the art. In DRUID conference, Aalborg (pp. 12-15). Retrieved from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.336.4438&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: A guide to the literature. Georgia Institute of Technology. https:// doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0001
Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003
Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values and innovation in Southwest Norway. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 555-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.548467
Fraceto, L. F., Grillo, R., de Medeiros, G. A., Scognamiglio, V., Rea, G., & Bartolucci, C. (2016). Nanotechnology in agriculture: which innovation potential does it have?. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 4, 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00020
Freitas, I., Clausen, T., Fontana, R. & Verspagen, B. (2011). Formal and informal external linkages and firms' innovative strategies. A cross-country comparison. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21, 91-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0188-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0188-y
Geografiya mashinobuduvannya svitu (2019). Access mode: http://www.geograf.com.ua/human/school-course/392-geografiya-mashinobuduvannya-svitu
Gkypali, ?., Kounetas, ?. & Tsekouras, K. (2019). European countries' competitiveness and productive performance evolution: unraveling the complexity in a heterogeneity context. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29, pp. 665-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0589-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0589-x
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online readings in psychology and culture, 2(1), 2307-0919. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
Ivanova, E., & Kordos, M. (2017). Competitiveness and innovation performance of regions in Slovak Republic. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 145-158. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.1-13
Jiang, L., & Probst, T. M. (2017). The rich get richer and the poor get poorer: Country-and state-level income inequality moderates the job insecurity-burnout relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(4), 672. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000179
Kachala, T., & Kovalchuk, Y. (2015). Ukrainian business in European integration process: a cluster approach. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v2i1.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v2i1.84
Kar, S., & Moura, J. M. (2013). Consensus+ innovations distributed inference over networks: cooperation and sensing in networked systems. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(3), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.2235193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.2235193
Kazakis, P. & Faggian, A. (2017). Mobility, education and labor market outcomes for U.S. graduates: Is selectivity important? The Annals of Regional Science, 59, 731-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0773-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0773-6
Kobushko, I. & Kobushko, Ia. (2015). The tax instruments of Ukraine's investment market regulation improving. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(1), 82–85.
Koç, E., & Boz, H. (2017). Development of scales to measure customers' willingness to have control and the control offered by service businesses. Ecoforum Journal, 6(3). Retrieved from: http://www.ecoforumjournal.ro/index.php/eco/article/viewFile/671/408
Koç, E., Ta?k?n, Ç., & Boz, H. (2019). Risk and Control in Consumer Behavior: A Discussion. In Contemporary Issues in Behavioral Finance. Emerald Publishing Limited, Volume 101, 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920190000101001
Kononenko, I. (1998). Metod ekspres-analizu rivnya konkurentospromozhnosti produktsiyi. Ekonomika Ukrayiny, 2, 80-83. Access mode: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311426547_Metod_ekspress-analiza_urovna_konkurentosposobnosti_produkcii
Kordos, M. (2019). British-Slovak Foreign Trade Relations: Consequences of Brexit. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 341-353. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.3-26
Kotenko, S., Shvindina, H., & Heiets, I. (2021). The impact of migration on the competitiveness of the region and industry development. E3S Web Conference, 307, 02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130702003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130702003
Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Arribas, D. (2012). Smart cities in perspective–a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innovation: The European journal of social science research, 25(2), 229-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660330
Kozmenko, S., & Vasyl'yeva, T. (2008). Specialized innovative investment banks in Ukraine. Banks and Bank Systems, 3(1), 48-56. doi:10.21511/bbs.3(1).2008.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.3(1).2008.01
Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Dickson, P., & Weaver, K. M. (2010). Cultural influences on entrepreneurial orientation: The impact of national culture on risk taking and proactiveness in SMEs. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(5), 959-984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00396.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00396.x
Kuckertz, A., Brändle, L., Gaudig, A., Hinderer, S., Reyes, C. A. M., Prochotta, A., ... & Berger, E. S. (2020). Startups in times of crisis–A rapid response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169
Kulchytska, Kh. & Predko, L. (2018). Analytic hierarchy process application to project selection in printing industry. Printing and publishing, 1(75), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.32403/0554-4866-2018-1-75-51-60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32403/0554-4866-2018-1-75-51-60
Kuvalin, D., Moiseev, A. & Lavrinenko, P. (2018). Russian Companies at the End of 2017: Absence of Significant General Economic Changes and Progress in the Machinery Industry. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 29, 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700718030085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700718030085
Lipkova, L., & Braga, D. (2016). Measuring commercialization success of innovations in the EU. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 15-30.
Lopez, M. (2017). Trade liberalization and premature deindustrialization in Colombia. Journal of Economic Structures, 6, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-017-0095-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-017-0095-6
Lu, X. U., Xiong, J., & Li, Q. (2018). Towards industry upgrading: A study of Catching Up strategy of Asian countries with focusing on Chinese sectors. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 5(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.204
Marrocu, E., Paci, R., & Usai, S. (2013). Proximity, networking and knowledge production in Europe: What lessons for innovation policy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1484-1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.004
Maslyak, P. & Dachno, I. (2003). Economic and social geography of the world – Kiev: Vecza, 280 p.
Meier, H., Roy, R., & Seliger, G. (2010). Industrial product-service systems—IPS2. CIRP annals, 59(2), 607-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.004
Murashkin, M. Y., Sabirov, I., Sauvage, X., & Valiev, R. Z. (2016). Nanostructured Al and Cu alloys with superior strength and electrical conductivity. Journal of materials science, 51(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9354-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9354-9
Musa H., Musova Z., Sliacky P. (2017). Financial Support to Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Slovakia. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 1(4), 47-52. DOI: 10.21272/fmir.1(4).47-52.2017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.1(4).47-52.2017
Nauwelaers, C., & Reid, A. (1995). Methodologies for the evaluation of regional innovation potential. Scientometrics, 34(3), 497-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02018016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018016
Özak, Ö. (2018). Distance to the pre-industrial technological frontier and economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 23, 175-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-018-9154-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-018-9154-6
Pererva, P., Besprozvannykh, O. , Tiutlikova, V., Kovalova, V., Kudina, O. & Dorokhov, O. (2019). Improvement of the Method for Selecting. TEM JOURNAL - Technology, Education, Management, Informatics, 8(2), 454-461. Access mode: https://www.temjournal.com/content/82 /TEMJournalMay2019 _ 454_461.pdf
Pradhan, R. P., Arvin, M. B., Nair, M., Bennett, S. E., & Hall, J. H. (2019). The information revolution, innovation diffusion and economic growth: an examination of causal links in European countries. Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1529-1563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0826-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0826-2
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of documentation, 25(4), 348-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482
Pukala, R., Sira, E., & Vavrek, R. (2018). Risk management and financing among start-ups. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 153-161. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.3-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2018.3-13
Ramzi, T. & Salah, A. (2018). The Determinants of Innovation Capacity in the Less Innovative Countries in the Euro-Mediterranean Region. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(2), 526-543. https://doi.org /10.1007/s13132-015-0347-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0347-3
Rizwan, Ch A., Semenog, A. (2017). Non-bank financial institutions activity in the context of economic growth: cross-country comparisons. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 1(2), 39-49. DOI: 10.21272/fmir.1(2).39-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.1(2).39-49.2017
Robinson, D. K., Huang, L., Guo, Y., & Porter, A. L. (2013). Forecasting Innovation Pathways (FIP) for new and emerging science and technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 267-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.06.004
Schwab, K. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019 – Geneva: Cologny, 650 p.
Shvindina H., Lyeonov S., Vasilyeva T. (2019) Economic Growth and Regional Disparities: Literature Review in a Search for the Interconnections. In: Reducing Inequalities Towards Sustainable Development Goals: Multilevel Approach / M.P. Bhandari, H. Shvindina (eds). Denmark: Rivers Publishers, 27-48 ISBN: 9788770221269. URL: https://www.riverpublishers.com/book_details.php?book_id=749
Shvindina, H. (2019). Coopetition as an emerging trend in research: perspectives for safety & security. Safety, 5(3), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety5030061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/safety5030061
Soliman, M., Lyulyov, O., Shvindina, H., Figueiredo, R. and Pimonenko, T. (2021). Scientific output of the European Journal of Tourism Research: A bibliometric overview and visualization. European Journal of Tourism Research, 28, 2801. Retrieved from https://ejtr.vumk.eu/index.php/about/article/view/2069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54055/ejtr.v28i.2069
Starchenko, L., Lyeonov, S., Vasylieva, T., Pimonenko, T., & Lyulyov, O. (2021). Environmental management and green brand for sustainable entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the E3S Web of Conferences, 234 doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202123400015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123400015
Sterev, N., & Rosillo, H. G. T. (2019). Technology, Innovations and Industrial Development. Economic Alternatives, (4), 549-559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37075/EA.2019.4.04
Taraniuk, L., Kobyzskyi, D. & Thomson, M. (2018). Estimation of the marketing potential of industrial enterprises in the period of re-engineering of business processes. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16 (2), 412-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.37
Taraniuk, L., Wang, J., Qiu, H., Petrushenko, Y. & Taraniuk, K. (2019). International aspects of assessing the logistic potential of the main countries of agricultural production. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 31-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.03
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research policy, 34(8), 1203-1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. (2013) VOSviewer Manual; Univeristeit Leiden: Leiden, The Netherlands. Retrieved from: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.10.pdf
Wignaraja, G., Krüger, J. & Tuazon A. (2016). Production Networks, Profits, and Innovative Activity: Evidence from Malaysia and Thailand. Production Networks and Enterprises in East Asia, 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55498-1_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55498-1_8
Wu, H., Xiong, J., Li, Q., & Wei, T. (2018). Comparisons of catch-up among developed nations and developing countries. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 5(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i2.206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i2.206
Zakutniaia, A., Hayriyan, A. (2017). Transparency as competitive advantage of innovation driven companies. Business Ethics and Leadership, 1(1), 46-54. https:// doi.org/10.21272/bel.2017.1-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.2017.1-06
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.