Quality management of the integrated development of Ukrainian light industry enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i4.921Keywords:
Integrated Development, Quality, Performance, Efficiency, Integration Map, Cost of IntegrationAbstract
This research aims to form a comprehensive methodological approach to assessing the quality of the integrated development of Ukrainian light industry enterprises as a groundwork for effective managerial decision-making. The methodological research toolkit includes developing an integration map, and modeling and forecasting the results of integrated development. This comprehensive evaluation helps to justify the effectiveness of management decisions and increase the quality of integrated enterprise development, as well as their performance as a whole. Based on the formed map of enterprise integration, groups of enterprises were identified: forwards, strikers, defenders, and outsiders. Using integrated development modeling, the potential quality level of a 1% cost increase in integrated development and the volumes of product sales of the surveyed companies was determined with regard to the group distribution for the period up to 2025. A considerable increase in the efficiency of integrated development is provided for the forward companies. It has been found that a high-quality level of the management of integrated development in light industry enterprises requires a longer period of time compared to other groups of enterprises due to the slow pace of reducing the cost of integrated business development.
References
Abbas, J., Raza, S., Nurunnabi, M., Minai, M. S., & Bano, S. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurial business networks on firms’ performance through a mediating role of dynamic capabilities. Sustainability, 11(11), 3006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113006
Al Hadidi, F., & Baghdadi, Y. (2019). Ontology for Enterprise Interactions: Extended and Virtual Enterprises. In ICT for a Better Life and a Better World (pp. 365-379). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10737-6_24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10737-6_24
Alac, P. (2018). Application of Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods for the Evaluation of Logistics Processes in Particular Woodprocessing Enterprise. In Actual scientific research, pp. 47-54.
Alhusen, H., & Bennat, T. (2021). Combinatorial innovation modes in SMEs: Mechanisms integrating STI processes into DUI mode learning and the role of regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 29(4), 779-805. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1786009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1786009
Alsawafi, A., Lemke, F., & Yang, Y. (2021). The impacts of internal quality management relations on the triple bottom line: A dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 232, 107927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107927
Amankwah?Amoah, J., Danso, A., & Adomako, S. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation, environmental sustainability and new venture performance: Does stakeholder integration matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2191
Asaul, A., Voynarenko, M., Dzhulii, L., Yemchuk, L., Skorobohata, L., & Mykoliuk, O. (2019, June). The latest information systems in the enterprise management and trends in their development. In 2019 9th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), pp. 409-412. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACITT.2019.8779874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACITT.2019.8779874
Azatbek, T., Bekenova, L., Baimukasheva, Z., & Velesko, S. (2019). Commercialization of intellectual development of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, (1), 80-93. https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-1467.113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518-1467.10
Bashir, M., & Farooq, R. (2019). The synergetic effect of knowledge management and business model innovation on firm competence. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2018-0103. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2018-0103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2018-0103
Bastas, A., & Liyanage, K. (2019). Integrated quality and supply chain management business diagnostics for organizational sustainability improvement. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 11-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.09.001
Binh, D. T., Lam, T. S., Nguyen, N. D., Ngoc, T. T. B., & Barysheva, G. A. (2020). Increasing the efficiency of the Textile and Garment Industry of Vietnam in the context of the dependence on foreign suppliers and investors. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 7(3), 363-374. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i3.598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v7i3.598
Botelho, D. F., Dias, B. H., de Oliveira, L. W., Soares, T. A., Rezende, I., & Sousa, T. (2021). Innovative business models as drivers for prosumers integration - Enablers and barriers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 111057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111057
Chang, J. Y., Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., & Wang, E. T. (2019). Enterprise system programs: Goal setting and cooperation in the integration team. Information & Management, 56(6), 103137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.12.005
Downs T. J. (2018). An Integrative Socio-Technical Enterprise Approach to Urban Design/Planning for Sustainable Development. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 8(02), 183. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2018.82015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2018.82015
Dykan, V., Pakharenko, O., Saienko, V., Skomorovskyi, A., & Neskuba, T. (2021). Evaluating the efficiency of the synergistic effect in the business network. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 8(1), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i1.646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i1.646
Eggert, A., Ulaga, W., Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2018). Conceptualizing and communicating value in business markets: From value in exchange to value in use. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.01.018
Handayani, S., & Nirwan, S. (2019, October). Analysis and Design of Integrated Marketing Communication (Imc) for Small and Medium Enterprise (Sme) Logistics Service Provider (Lsp) from Web Based Application Perspective. In The 1 International Conference on Innovation of Small Medium-sized Enterprise (ICIS) 2019 (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 45-46).
Hedvall, K., Jagstedt, S., & Dubois, A. (2019). Solutions in business networks: Implications of an interorganizational perspective. Journal of Business Research, 104, 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.035
Hein, A., Weking, J., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019). Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 29(3), 503-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00337-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00337-y
Hrebennikova, A., Artemchuk, L., Nahornyi, V., Daliak, N., & Ruban, O. (2021). Assessment of the network interaction synergistic effect according to the organization life cycle. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 8(3), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i3.754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i3.754
Hughes, P., Hughes, M., Stokes, P., Lee, H., Rodgers, P., & Degbey, W. Y. (2020). Micro-foundations of organizational ambidexterity in the context of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119932
Ikram, A., Su, Q., Fiaz, M., & Rehman, R. U. (2018). Cluster strategy and supply chain management. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25 (5), 1302-1318. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2015-0059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2015-0059
Imamuddin, A. (2021). An Enterprise Resource Planning System Solution for Small-Mid Size Enterprises: An Information System Development Case Study. Journal of Computer Science, Information Technology and Telecommunication Engineering, 2(1), 160-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.30596%2Fjcositte.v2i1.6534
Juntunen, J. K., Halme, M., Korsunova, A., & Rajala, R. (2019). Strategies for integrating stakeholders into sustainability innovation: a configurational perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(3), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12481
Kaur, M., Singh, K., & Singh, D. (2019). Synergetic success factors of total quality management (TQM) and supply chain management (SCM). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 36 (6), 842-863. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-11-2017-0228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-11-2017-0228
Khalatur, S., Khaminich, S., Budko, O., Dubovych, O., & Karamushka, O. (2020). Multiple system of innovation-investment decisions adoption with synergetic approach usage. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 2745-2763. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(12) DOI: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(12)
Khanizad, R., & Montazer, G. A. (2021). A model for optimal allocation of human resources based on the operational performance of organisational units by multi-agent systems. International Journal of Operational Research, 40(1), 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2021.111952 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2021.10034200
Kiesnere, A. L., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2019). Sustainability management emergence and integration on different management levels in smaller large?sized companies in Austria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1607-1626. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1854
McMaster, M., Nettleton, C., Tom, C., Xu, B., Cao, C., & Qiao, P. (2020). Risk management: Rethinking fashion supply chain management for multinational corporations in light of the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(8), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13080173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13080173
Novikova, T. S. (2018). Approaches to the Efficiency Evaluation for the Complex of Interrelated Investment Projects. World of Economics and Management, 18(3), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2018-18-3-66-80 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2018-18-3-66-80
Ogai Y., Matsumura Y., Hoshino Y. (2020). Changing structures of B2B networks in the Japanese textile and apparel industry. Fashion and Textiles, 7 (1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-019-0198-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-019-0198-9
Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). Why and how to compete through sustainability: a review and outline of trends influencing firm and network-level transformation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00558-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00558-9
Ruziyeva, E. A., Nurgaliyeva, A. M., Duisenbayeva, B. B., Assanova, A. B., & Shtiller, M. V. (2019). Analysis of investments role in the economic development. Bulletin of National academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2(378), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518-1467.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518-1467.55
Samani, M. A., Ismail, N., Leman, Z., & Zulkifli, N. (2019). Development of a conceptual model for risk-based quality management system. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(5-6), 483-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1310617 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1310617
Tarigan, Z., Mochtar, J., Basana, S., & Siagian, H. (2021). The effect of competency management on organizational performance through supply chain integration and quality. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.3.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2021.3.004
Tomashuk, I. V., & Tomashuk, I. O. (2021). Enterprise development strategy: innovation and internal flexibility. ?olloquium-journal. Warszawa. Poland: Warszawa, 90 (3), 51-66. http://81.30.162.23/repository/getfile.php/27736.pdf
Trach, R., Lendo-Siwicka, M., Pawluk, K., & Bilous, N. (2019). Assessment of the effect of integration realisation in construction projects. Tehni?ki glasnik, 13(3), 254-259. https://doi.org/10.31803/tg-20180810113043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31803/tg-20180810113043
Trad, A., & Kalpi?, D. (2020). Business Transformation and Enterprise Architecture: The Holistic Project Asset Management Concept (HPAMC). In Handbook of Research on Strategic Fit and Design in Business Ecosystems (pp. 194-230). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1125-1.ch009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1125-1.ch009
Veile, J. W., Schmidt, M. C., & Voigt, K. I. (2022). Toward a new era of cooperation: How industrial digital platforms transform business models in Industry 4.0. Journal of Business Research, 143, 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.062
Zhang, H., Xiao, H., Wang, Y., Shareef, M. A., Akram, M. S., & Goraya, M. A. S. (2021). An integration of antecedents and outcomes of business model innovation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Research, 131, 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.045
Zholonko, T., Grebinchuk, O., Bielikova, M., Kulynych, Y., & Oviechkina, O. (2021). Methodological tools for investment risk assessment for the companies of real economy sector. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14020078
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.