Land Grant System and its Impact on the Pre-modern Central Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v1i1.45Keywords:
Khanates, production, surplus, labor, tenantsAbstract
Pre-modern Central Asia was comprised of three principalities: 1. the Emirate of Bukhara, and Khanates of 2. Khiva and 3. Khokand. These principalities were caught in the web of socio-economic and political crises. To cope with these crises and to solve the problem of the expenditure of huge administrative costs, the Khans and Amirs distributed some portions of land from the state lands (amlok) as grants among their heirs, both civil and military officials. This paper concludes that instead of solving the problems, the distribution of land grant adversely affected the normative political order. The grantees, as landlords, began exercising enormous political and economic powers. These actions created immense exploitation of the subaltern tenants. The landlords siphoned off the tenants’ surplus and consequently subjected them to the most appalling conditions with their housing, food, and clothing.
References
Adle, Chahryar and Habib, Irfan. (2003). History of Civilizations of Central Asia, V. UNESCO: Paris.
Allworth, E. A. (1967). Central Asia: A Century of Russian Rule. New York/London: Columbia University Press.
Allworth, E. A. (1990). The Modern Uzbeks: A Cultural History. Stanford/California: Hoover Institution Press.
Aminova, R. Kh. (1974). Changes in Uzbekistan Agriculture (1917-1929). Central Department of Oriental Literature, Moscow: Nauka Publishing House.
Becker, Symour. (1968). Russian Protectorates in Central Asia: Bukhara and Khiva - 1865-1924. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Becon, Elizebth E. (1966). Central Asians under Russian Rule: A Study in Culture Change. London: Cornell University Press.
Bregel, Yuri. (2011). Central Asia in the 18th-19th Centuries. Encyclopedia Iranica. http:// www. iranica.com/articles/ central-asia-vii (assessed on 10/06/2012)
Burns, Alexander. (2003). Travels into Bukhara together with a Narrative of a Voyage on the Indus. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications.
Burton, Audrey. (1997). Bukharan Trade: Dynastic, Diplomatic and Commercial History (1550-1702). Surrey: Curzon Press.
C. Foltz, Richard (1998). Mughal India and Central Asia. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
D’ Ecausse, Helene Carrere. (1996). Islam and Russian Empire: Reform and Revolution in Central Asian. tr. by Quintin Hoare, London: I. B. Tauris and Co. Ltd.
Davydov, G. A., Fedorov. (1983). Archaeological Research in Central Asia of the Muslim Period. World Archaeology. 14 (3). Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1983.9979877
Djan, Mulla Mohammad Yunis. (2003). The Life of Alimqul: A Native Chronicle of the 19th century Central Asia. tr. Timur K. Beisembiev, New York/London: Routledge Curzon.
Gufurov, B. G. (2005). Central Asia: Pre-Historic to Pre-Modern Times. Vol. 2, Kolkata: Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies.
Hiader, Mansura. (2004). Medieval Central Asia: Polity, Economy and Military Organization (Fourteenth to Sixteenth Centuries), New Delhi: Manohar Publishers and Distributors.
Hutton, James. (1875/2005). Central Asia from the Aryan to the Cossacks. New Delhi: Manas Publications.
Izzatullah, Mir. (1882). Travels in Central Asia in the Year 1812-13. tr. P. D. Henderson, Calcutta: Foreign Department.
Khalid, Adeeb. (1998). The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia, Berkeley/Los Angles/London: University of California Press.
Khan, Hafiz Muhammad Fazil. (1981). Tarikh-i-Manazali-Bukhara. tr. Iqtidar Husian Siddique. Centre of Central Asian Studies, University of Kashmir, Srinagar.
Khan, Sarfraz. (2003). Muslim Reformist Political Thought: Revivalist, Modernist and Free Will. New York: Routeldge Curzon.
Levi, Scott C. (2007). India and Central Asia: Commerce and Culture (1500-1800). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Manz, Beatrice Forbes. (1987). Central Asian Uprisings in the Nineteenth Century: Ferghana under the Russians. Russian Review. 46(3). London: Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/130563
Marx, K. (1857). Outline of the critique of political economy. Sage Publishers: 1939.
Murav’yov, Nikolay. (1977). Journey to Khiva Through the Turkmon Country. London: Oguz Press.
Natsagdorj, Academician Sh. (1967). The Economic Basis of Feudalism in Mongolia. Modern Asian Studies, 1(3). London: Cambridge University Press, 1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X00002493
Schomberg, R. C. F. (1932). The Habitability of Chinese Turkestan. The Geographical Journal. 80(6). The Royal Geographical Society, Institute of British Geographers, London: Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1784151
Tabib, Rashi-ud-din. (1971). The Successors of Changiz Khans. tr. John Andrew Boyle. New York: Columbia University Press.
Tulepbayev, B. (1986). Socialist Agrarian Reforms in Soviet Central Asia and Kazakhstan. Moscow: Nanka Publishers.
Weinerman, Eli. (1993). The Polemics between Moscow and Central Asians on the Decline of Central Asia and Tsarist Russia's Role in the History of the Region. The Slavonic and East European Review. 71(3). School of Slavonic and East European Studies.
Williams, D. S. M., (1974). Fiscal Reform in Turkestan. The Slavonic and East European Review. 52(128). Modern Humanities Research Association and University College London: Maney Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.