Foreign companies’ CSR themes and objectives in Central Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v6i2.279Keywords:
transition economy, Corporate Social Responsibility, Multinational Corporations, Institutional TheoryAbstract
The study showcases key themes and objectives of CSR of MNCs in transition economies and the types of CSR activities reported to the audience. The contribution of the paper is in bringing insights into the goals, motives, and objectives of CSR of MNCs in Central Asia. The findings of the study are based on the content analysis of the companies’ CSR activities explicitly reported to the audience. Multiple sources of publicly available data on MNCs (CSR reports, annual reports, websites of the companies, local news outlets reporting about CSR of foreign companies) were collected, coded and analyzed to generate the findings. The limitation of the study is in the limited number of companies/countries reviewed. This paper contributes to the literature on CSR of MNCs in transition economies.
References
Altaliyeva, A. (2003). Viewpoint Global responsibility-vision from Central Asia/vision of Central Asia. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 3(3), 90-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700310483479
Amaladoss, M. X., & Manohar, H. L. (2013). Communicating corporate social responsibility–A case of CSR communication in emerging economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2), 65-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.287
Amran, A., & Susela Devi, S. (2008). The impact of government and foreign affiliate influence on corporate social reporting: The case of Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(4), 386-404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810864327
Azizi, S. A., & Jamali, D. (2016). CSR in Afghanistan: a global CSR agenda in areas of limited statehood. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 5(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJGBR-01-2015-0007
Bashtovaya, V. (2014). CSR reporting in the United States and Russia. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(1), 68-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2012-0150
Baskin, J. (2006). Value, values and sustainability: Corporate responsibility in emerging market companies. Available at SSRN 1094573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1094573
Cai S, Jun M, Yang Z. 2006. The impact of interorganizational internet communication on purchasing performance: A study of Chinese manufacturing firms. The Journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply Summer 2006: 16–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2006.00014.x
Cai, Y., Jo, H., & Pan, C. (2012). Doing well while doing bad? CSR in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 467-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1103-7
Campbell JL. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 32(3): 946–967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
Carroll, A. B. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 114-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2004.13836269
Chappel, M., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven country study of CSR.
Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in asia a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Business & society, 44(4), 415-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305281658
Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2007). CSR agendas for Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(4), 183-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.159
Cormier, D., & Gordon, I. M. (2001). An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(5), 587-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006264
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management journal, 16(2), 312-322.
Fardhani, A. D., & Nainggolan, Y. A. (1998). Examining the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Credit Rating of Firms in Indonesia.
Fifka, M. S., & Pobizhan, M. (2014). An institutional approach to corporate social responsibility in Russia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 82, 192-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.091
Gulbrandsen, L. H., & Moe, A. (2005). Oil company CSR collaboration in'new'petro-states. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (20), 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2005.wi.00008
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of management journal, 43(3), 249-267.
Haufler, V. (2010). Disclosure as governance: The extractive industries transparency initiative and resource management in the developing world. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 53-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00014
Haufler, V. (2004). International diplomacy and the privatization of conflict prevention. International Studies Perspectives, 5(2), 158-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2004.00166.x
Haddock Fraser, J., & Fraser, I. (2008). Assessing corporate environmental reporting motivations: differences between ‘close?to?market’and ‘business to business’ companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(3), 140-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.147
Jamali, D., & Karam, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. International Journal of Management Reviews.Egri and Ralston, 2008;
Kostjuk, K. 2005. Russia: The line between small businesses and big politics. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), CSR across Europe: 209-218. Ber lin: Springer.
Kyriazis E, Massey GR. 2008. The effects of formal and informal communication between marketing and RandD managers during new product development
projects.
Kolk, A. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Coffee Sector:: The Dynamics of MNC Responses and Code Development. European Management Journal, 23(2), 228-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.02.003
Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals' reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.511
Kolk, A., & Lenfant, F. (2010). MNC reporting on CSR and conflict in Central Africa. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 241-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0271-1
Kotilainen, J., Prokhorova, E., Sairinen, R., & Tiainen, H. (2015). Corporate social responsibility of mining companies in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Resources Policy, 45, 202-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.06.001
Kyriazis, E., & Massey, G. (2008). The effects of formal and informal communication between marketing and R&D managers during new product development projects. In Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Conference. Academy of Marketing, Aberdeen (pp. 1-10).
Letza, S., Sun, X., & Kirkbride, J. (2004). Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 242-262.
Miller, T. 2005. A Chinese definition of CSR. Ethical Corporation, 34-35. Mokhiber, R., & Weissman, R.
Mahmood, M., & Humphrey, J. (2013). Stakeholder expectation of corporate social responsibility practices: a study on local and multinational corporations in Kazakhstan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(3), 168-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1283
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514.
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective.The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/259398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility.Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. (2003). The emergence of corporate governance in Russia. Journal of World Business, 38(4), 284-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2003.08.016
http://www.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@commerce/documents/doc/uow044915.pdf [16 August 2010].
Prahalad, C. K. 2005. The fortune at the bottom of the pyra mid. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publish ing.
Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. (2008). Ethical turnarounds and transformational leadership: A global imperative for corporate social responsibility. Thunderbird International Business Review, 50(5), 303-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20214
Preuss, L., & Barkemeyer, R. (2011). CSR priorities of emerging economy firms: is Russia a different shape of BRIC?. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 11(4), 371-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701111159226
Qiu, L. D., & Tao, Z. (2001). Export, foreign direct investment, and local content requirement. Journal of Development Economics, 66(1), 101-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(01)00157-2
Smirnova Y. Perceptions of corporate social responsibility in Kazakhstan //Social Responsibility Journal. – 2012. – ?. 8. – ? 3. – ?. 404-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111211247974
Schmidheiny, S. (2006). A view of corporate citizenship in Latin America. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (21), 21-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2006.sp.00004
Sotorrío, L. L., & Sánchez, J. L. F. (2010). Corporate social reporting for different audiences: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(5), 272-283.
Sotorrío, L. L., & Sánchez, J. L. F. (2010). Corporate social reporting for different audiences: The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(5), 272-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.215
Rama D, Massey G. 2007. The impact of communication quality and frequency on organisational learning during new product development.
ANZMAC, 1–9. http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/research/handle/10453/2248?show=full [16 October 2010].
Smith BJ, Barclay DW. 1998. The effects of organizational differences and trust on the effectiveness of selling partner relationships. Journal of Marketing 61: 3–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299706100102
Letza, S., Sun, X., & Kirkbride, J. (2004). Shareholding versus stakeholding: A critical review of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 242-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00367.x
Ullmann, A. A. (1985). Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of management review, 10(3), 540-557.
Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: Insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491028
Ho, F. N., Wang, H. M. D., & Vitell, S. J. (2012). A global analysis of corporate social performance: The effects of cultural and geographic environments. Journal of business ethics, 107(4), 423-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1047-y
Husted B, Allen D. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise: Strategic and institutional approaches. Journal of International Business Studies 37: 838–849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400227
Skjærseth, J. B., Tangen, K., Swanson, P., Christiansen, A. C., Moe, A., & Lunde, L. (2004). Limits to Corporate Social Responsibility: A comparative study of four major oil companies. FNI Report, 7(2004), 1-26.
"Q. How does the WEO categorize advanced versus emerging and developing economies?". International Monetary Fund. Retrieved July 20, 2009.
Wanderley, L. S. O., Lucian, R., Farache, F., & de Sousa Filho, J. M. (2008). CSR information disclosure on the web: a context-based approach analysing the influence of country of origin and industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 369-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9892-z
Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitley, R. 1997. Business systems. In A. Sorge & M. Warner (Eds.), The IEBM handbook of organizational behavior: 173-186. London: International Thomson Business Press.
Zhao, M. (2012). CSR-based political legitimacy strategy: Managing the state by doing good in China and Russia. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 439-460. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1209-6
Zinkin, J. (2004). Maximising the licence to operate': CSR from an Asian perspective. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, (14), 67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2004.su.00008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.
