The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives

Authors

  • Mohammad Ayub Khan Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey
  • Ebner Noam Creighton University’s Graduate School, Omaha, NE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189

Keywords:

Higher education institutions, Internationalization, Self-internationalization, Types of education internationalization

Abstract

Institutions of higher education increasingly engage in internationalization efforts for a variety of reasons.  The collection of practices these institutions engage in, which can be called conventional internationalization models (CIM), primarily focus on centralized and institutionalized efforts.  This paper reviews typical aspects of CIM, noting their benefits while also spotlighting the costs they entail and the open spaces they leave.  The paper then introduces the self-internationalization model (SIM) as a complement and a supplement to CIM.  SIM offers a less centralized approach to internationalization, focusing instead on individual initiatives taken by faculty, academic managers, and students.  This paper explains the functional aspects of SIM and its comparative advantages and disadvantages vis-à-vis CIM.  Furthermore, it provides guidelines for the design and implementation of comprehensive, innovative, flexible, and dynamic internationalization models combining SIM and CIM in a manner that is suitable, convenient, affordable, and beneficial for all stakeholders in higher education institutions.

Author Biography

Mohammad Ayub Khan, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey

Professor Mohammad Ayub Khan, PhD

Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico

References

Altbach, P. G. (2004b). ´Globalization and the University: Myths and Realities in an unequal world, ´In Tertiary Education 10:3?25, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers in Altbach, Philip G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, Laura E. (2009), ´Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution, France: UNESCO.

Alemu, S. K. (n/a). ´Rewards and Challenges of Internationalization of Higher Education in Africa, ´ Sintayehu Kassaye Alemu, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana?Slovenia. Retrieved from https://www.pef.unilj.si/fileadmin/Datoteke/Mednarodna/conference/where/after/alemu-proceedings.pdf.

Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L.E. (2009). ´Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution, ´ A report prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.cep.edu.rs/public/Altbach,_Reisberg,_Rumbley_Tracking_an_Academic_Revolution,_UNESCO_2009.pdf

American Council on Education (2015). ´CIGE Model for Comprehensive Internationalization, ´ Retrieved from http://www.acenet.edu/news-room/Pages/CIGE-Model-for-Comprehensive-Internationalization.aspx/.

Baburajan, P.K. (2011). ´Impact of Globalization of Higher Education in the UAE, ´Delhi Business Review X, 12(1) 29-35. Retrieved from http://www.delhibusinessreview.org/v12n1/v12n1c.pdf

Becker, R. (2010). ´International branch campuses: New trends and directions, ´International Higher Education, 58, 3-5. Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/view/8464/7598

Bernardo, A. B. I. (1998). ´Towards the functional diversification and specialization of Philippine higher education institutions: A one-hundred-year proposition for the evolution of Philippine colleges and universities, ´ Perspectives, 19(1). 18-32.

Cantwell, B., & Maldonado-Maldonado, A. (2009). ´Four stories: confronting contemporary ideas about globalization and internationalization in higher education, ´Globalization, Societies and Education, 7(3): 289–306.

Chan, W. W., & Dimmock, C. (2008). ´The internationalization of universities Globalist, internationalist and translocalist models, ´ Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2): 184-204.

Childress, L. (2009). ´Internationalization plans for higher education institutions. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13(3): 289-309.

Colucci, E., Ferencz, I., Gaebel, M., & Wächter, B. (2014). ´Connecting mobility policies and practice: Observations and recommendations on national and institutional developments in Europe, ´ Brussels: European University Association.

Daly, A. (2011). ´Determinants of participation in Australian university student exchange programs. Journal of Research in International Education, 10, 58–70.

De Wit, H. (1995). ´Strategies for the Internationalization of Higher Education. A Comparative Study of Australia, Canada, Europe, and the United States of America. European Association of International Education (EAIE).

De Wit, H. (2002). ´Internationalization of Higher Education in the United States of America and Europe: A Historical, Comparative and Conceptual Analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Deem, R., & Brehony, K. (2005). ´Management as Ideology: The Case of New Managerialism in Higher Education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2): 213-231.

Delgado-Márquez, B. L., Hurtado-Torres, N. E., & Bondar, Y. (2011). ´Internationalization of Higher Education: Theoretical and Empirical Investigation of Its Influence on University Institution Rankings, ´ In: Globalization and Internationalization of Higher Education. Revistade Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC). 8 (2): pp. 265-284. Retrieved from http://rusc.uoc.edu

Egron-Polak, E., & Hudson, R. (2014). ´Internationalization of higher education: Growing expectations, fundamental values, ´ IAU 4th Global Survey. International Association of Universities.

European Union, (2015). ´Centre for Higher Education Internationalization (CHEI). Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies/.

Hawawini, G. (2011). ´Faculty and Research Working Paper: The Internationalization of Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Review and A Radical Proposal. INSEAD: The Business School for the World. Retrieved from http://www.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/doc.cfm?

Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblat, D., & Perraton, J. (1999). ´Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture, ´ Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Hudzik, J. K. (2012). ´Emerging Models of Higher Education Internationalization: Concept to Action, ´ Challenge and Opportunity STINT Foundation Seminar on University Strategies for Internationalization Stockholm.

Henard, F., Diamond, L., & Roseyeare, D. (2012). ´Approaches to Internationalization and Their Implications for Strategic Management and Institutional Practice.

International Strategy Office (2015). ´International Trends in Higher Education. University Offices, ´ Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD. Retrieved from: https://www.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/oxford/International%20Trends%20in%20Higher%20Education%202015.pdf

International Association of Universities (IAU) (2012). ´Affirming Academic Value in Internationalization of Higher Education: A Call for Action.

Khan, M. A., Bank, D., Okon, E. E., Al-Qaimari, G., Olivares-Olivares, S. L., & Treviño-Martinez, S., (2014). Diverse Contemporary Issues Facing Business Management Education. Idea Group, USA.

Kim, E.H., & Zhu, M. (2010). ´Universities as firms: The case of US overseas programs, ´ In C.T.

Knight, J., & de Wit, H. (1995). ´Strategies for internationalization of higher education: historical and conceptual perspectives, ´ Retrieved from http://lisbon2011.bolognaexperts.net/sites/default/files/yesinternationalis_knight_and_de_wit.pdf

Knight, J. (1994). ´Internationalization: Elements and Checkpoints, ´ Research Monograph, 7, Ottawa: Canadian Bureau for International Education. www.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED549823.pdf

Knight, J. (1997). ´Internationalization of Higher Education: A Conceptual Framework, ´ In: Knight, J. & De Wit. H. (eds). ´Internationalization of Higher Education in the Asia Pacific Countries, ´Amsterdam: European Association of International Education (EAIE). Pages 5-19.

Knight, J. (1999). ´A time of turbulence and transformation for internationalization, ´ (Research Monograph, No. 14). Ottawa: Canadian Bureau for International Education, www.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED549870.pdf

Knight, J: (2003). Updated internationalization definition. International Higher Education 33 (2003) 2-3. https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/viewFile/7391/6588.

Knight, J. (2003b). ´Internationalization Practices and Priorities: 2003 IAU Survey Report, ´ International Association of Universities, Paris. https://iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/internationalisation_2003_0.pdf

Luijten-Lub, A. (2007). ´Choices in internationalization. How higher education institutions respond to internationalization, Europeanisation, and globalization, ´ Enschede: CHEPS. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/6085872

Mansor, Z. D. (2009). ´International strategic alliance in higher education sectors (Learning for competitive advantage) - A case from Malaysian private college, ´ The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 5(2). http://www.hraljournal.com/Page/9%20Zuraina%20Dato%20Mansor.pdf

OECD (2004). ´Education at a Glance, ´ OECD Indicators 2004, Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9604081e.pdf?expires=1518899082&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=CFA85035C48A74F0DD3AE37536B1971A

OECD (2012), Education at a Glance 2012: Highlights, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag_highlights-2012-en

Vught, F. V. (n.d). ´Internationalization and globalization in European Higher Education, ´ The Netherlands: University of Twente. http://www.humane.eu/fileadmin/wsan_docs/ws2004/ws2004_Mon_VanVught_1_Internationalisation.pdf

Downloads

Published

2018-05-01

How to Cite

Khan, M. A., & Noam, E. (2018). The Self-Internationalization Model (SIM) versus Conventional Internationalization Models (CIMs) of the institutions of higher education: A preliminary insight from management perspectives. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.189