Analyzing the influence of hygienic and motivating factors on employee performance: Insights of HRM practices from university and industry settings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v11i2.1429Keywords:
HRM practices, motivation, hygienic and motivating factors, performance, two-factor theoryAbstract
Many contemporary HRM systems have been developed based on motivation theories. Herzberg's theory of motivation serves as a methodology for examining and constructing motivation systems within organizations. This study aims to uncover the relationship between respondents' descriptive characteristics and hygienic/motivating factors and their impact on employee performance in the university and the industry. Employing a questionnaire method and utilizing Likert's 5-point scale for assessment, the authors collected, coded, and analyzed data using the SPSS Statistics Program. The study establishes the influence of hygienic and motivating factors on employee performance. When the hygienic factor increases by one unit, university employees' performance decreases by 0.239 units. In industry, it decreases by 0.085. Both research subjects showcase a direct relationship between performance and motivating factors, demonstrating a positive correlation. When the motivating factors see an increase of one unit, university employees' performance likewise increases by 0.643 units. In the Industry context, this rise in motivation corresponds to a 0.245 unit increase. Within the two-factor theory framework, both factors are deemed significant for employees, yet providing motivating factors is considered more crucial. Enhanced motivation through equitable and adequate stimuli practices corresponds to increased employee performance.
References
Abdrasilov, B., Kudaibergenov, Z., Kelesbayev, D., & Baimaganbetov, S. (2021). Analysis of human resources management practices: The impact of training on performance efficiency of employees of Akhmet Yassawi University. Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Economy Series, 101(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.31489/2021Ec1/4-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31489/2021ec1/4-15
Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L., & Maude, P. (2017). Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory. Life Science Journal, 14(5), 12–16.
Destianti, V., Fakhri, M., Madiawati, P. N., Nurnida, I., & Kurnia, B. (2021, March 7). The Effect of Job Stress and Job Motivation Toward Employee Performance in Department of Tourism and Culture Bandung. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. 11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Singapore, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20210961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20210961
Fajar, R. K. (2022). Leadership style and personnel performance: A literature review. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 9(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n4.2097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v9n4.2097
Guzhina, G., & Ezhkova, V. (2021). Modern Recruitment Technologies and Methods of Motivation in the Management Process. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 16(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.22394/2071-2367-2021-16-2-112-124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22394/2071-2367-2021-16-2-112-124
Herachwati, N. (2013). Performance appraisal. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 23(2), 189–196.
Kampkötter, P. (2017). Performance appraisals and job satisfaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(5), 750–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1109538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1109538
Kowshik, C. N., & Mahesh, Dr. G. (2019). Personnel Performance Appraisal Dimensions For Indian Construction Organizations. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(4), 3404–3410. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D6754.118419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.D6754.118419
Kurniawanto, H., Rahmadi, Z. T., Wahyudi, M. A., Yai, U. P., & Gie, I. K. K. (2022). Effect Of Work Environment And Motivation On Employee Performance With Job Satisfaction As A Mediation. 3(3).
Kuswati, Y. (2020). The Effect of Motivation on Employee Performance. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.928
Lalwani, S., & Lalwani, Sushil. J. (2017). Relevance of Herzberg's Hygiene Theory in Today's Context: An Analysis of Motivators and Hygiene Factors in Present Scenario in Indian Context. Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and Management Studies, 5(7), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.12816/0037247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12816/0037247
Lorincová, S., Štarchoň, P., Weberová, D., Hitka, M., & Lipoldová, M. (2019). Employee Motivation as a Tool to Achieve Sustainability of Business Processes. Sustainability, 11(13), 3509. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133509
Mioni, G., Cardullo, S., Ciavarelli, A., & Stablum, F. (2021). Age-related changes in time discrimination: The involvement of inhibition, working memory and speed of processing. Current Psychology, 40(5), 2462–2471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00170-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00170-8
Mitsakis, M., & Galanakis, M. (2022). An Empirical Examination of Herzberg's Theory in the 21st Century Workplace. Organizational Psychology Re-Examined. Psychology, 13(2), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2022.132015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2022.132015
Mládková, L., Zouharová, J., & Nový, J. (2015). Motivation and Knowledge Workers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 768–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.163
Ozsoy, E. (2019). An Empirical Test of Herzberg's Two-Factor Motivation Theory. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.1-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.1-01
Riyanto, S., Endri, E., & Herlisha, N. (2021). Effect of work motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance: Mediating role of employee engagement. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(3), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.14
Sanjeev, M. A., & Surya, A. V. (2016). Two Factor Theory of Motivation and Satisfaction: An Empirical Verification. Annals of Data Science, 3(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-016-0077-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-016-0077-9
Serra, D. J. G. (2019). An integrating conception of human motivation. Psicologia Em Estudo, 24, e44183. https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v24i0.44183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v24i0.44183
ShaemiBarzoki, A., Attafar, A., & RezaJannati, A. (2012). An Analysis of Factors Affecting the Employees Motivation based on Herzberg's Hygiene Factors Theory (The study: Golpayegan City Saipa Corporation Industrial Complex's Staff ). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(8), 115–123.
Shafiee, H., Razminia, E., & Zeymaran, N. K. (2016). Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Structure Factors and Personnel Performance. International Journal of Management, Accounting & Economics, 3(2), 160–165.
Stankovska, G., Angelkoska, S., Osmani, F., & Grncarovska, P. (2017). BCES Conference Book. Higher Education, 15.
Van Der Kolk, B., Van Veen-Dirks, P. M. G., & Ter Bogt, H. J. (2019). The Impact of Management Control on Employee Motivation and Performance in the Public Sector. European Accounting Review, 28(5), 901–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1553728 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1553728
Wan Yusoff, W. F., Kian, T. S., & Idris, M. T. M. (2013). Herzberg's Two Factors Theory on Work Motivation: Does Its Work For Todays Environment? Global Journal of Commerce and Management Perspective, 2(5), 18–22.
Wang, J., & Hooi, R. (2019). The moderation effect of workplace experience on innovation motivation: A study of STEM faculty in Singapore. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(7), 862–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1566524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1566524
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zhandos Kudaibergenov, Botagoz Bolatova, Aigul Kurmanalina, Kuralay Balginova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.
