Quantifying systemic and idiosyncratic risks in agriculture: A study of Kazakhstan's grain production volatility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i7.1417Keywords:
Agriculture, Grain Production, Systemic Risk, Idiosyncratic Risk, Economic LossAbstract
This article aims to propose a method for quantifying the impact of idiosyncratic and systemic risks on agricultural production volatility and to develop techniques and procedures for calculating the number of losses due to systemic risks. The analysis is based on grain yield and price data adjusted for inflation, trends, and acreage in the northern grain-producing region of Kazakhstan from 2005 to 2017. This study presents a method for determining the proportion of systemic and idiosyncratic risk in variations in agricultural production volume. Using a method based on the beta factor can significantly reduce subjectivism and prevent exploitation when assessing and compensating farmers for damages resulting from adverse natural phenomena. The authors believe this is the first study to examine the impact of systemic and idiosyncratic risks on the volatility of production volumes in the grain industry under specific economic conditions in emerging markets.
References
Bokusheva R., Heidelbach O., and Kussaiynov T. (2007). Crop insurance in Kazakhstan. Analysis of the possibilities of effective risk management. Halle/Saale, IAMO, 81 p.
Bokusheva R., Hockmann H., and Kumbhakar S.C. (2012). Dynamics of productivity and technical efficiency in Russian agriculture. European Review of Agricultural Economics 39(4): 611–637, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr059
Challinor A. J., Parkes B., and Ramirez-Villegas J. (2015). Crop yield response to climate change varies with cropping intensity. Global Change Biology, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 1679-1688, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12808 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12808
Conradt S., Bokusheva R., Finger R., and Kussaiynov T. (2014). Yield trend estimation in the presence of farm heterogeneity and non-linear technological change. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 53(2): 121–140, https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.195732
Füssel H.-M. (2007). Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustainability Science, Vol. 2, pp 265-275, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0032-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0032-y
Gitman L.J. and Joehnk M.D. (2001). Fundamentals of Investing. Pearson Higher Education & Professional Group, 661 p.
Hoffman A. L., Kemanian A. R., and Forest Ch. E. (2018). Analysis of climate signals in the crop yield record of sub-Saharan Africa. Global Change Biology, Vol. 24, pp. 143-157, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13901
Kazakhstan may suffer economic losses in wheat production due to climate change. (2020). URL: https://www.kz.undp.org/content/kazakhstan/ru/home/stories/2020/kazakhstan-may-suffer-economic-losses-in-wheat-production-due-to.html (accessed: 19.04.2022).
Khanal U., Wilson C., Hoang V., and Lee B. (2018). Farmers' Adaptation to Climate Change, Its Determinants and Impacts on Rice Yield in Nepal. Ecological Economics, Vol. 144, pp. 139-147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.006
King M., Altdorff D., Li P., Galagedara L., Holden J., and Unc A. (2018). Northward shift of the agricultural climate zone under 21st-century global climate change. Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, No. 1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26321-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26321-8
Kussaiynov Т.А. (2017). Agricultural decisions under uncertainty. Herald Of Science Of S Seifullin Kazakh Agro Technical Research University. Astana, S.Seifullin Agrotechnical University, 135 p.
Mason C., Hayes D.J. and Lence S.H. (2003). Systemic Risk in U.S. Crop Reinsurance Programs. Agricultural Finance Review, Spring 2003: 23-41, https://doi.org/10.1108/00214980380001139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00214980380001139
Miranda J.M. and Glauber J.W. (1997). Systemic Risk, Reinsurance, and the Failure of Crop Insurance Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 79 (February 1997): 206-215, https://doi.org/10.2307/1243954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1243954
Morel J., Kumar U., Ahmed M., Bergkvist G., Lana M., Halling M., and Parsons D. (2021). Quantification of the Impact of Temperature, CO2, and Rainfall Changes on Swedish Annual Crops Production Using the APSIM Model. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, Vol. 5, Art. No. 665025, 11 p, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.665025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.665025
On compulsory insurance in crop production. Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated March 10, 2004 No. 533-II : expired on January 6, 2020 in accordance with the Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated October 28, 2019 No. 268-VI. Access from the information system “Paragraph”.
The EU has allocated 200 thousand euros to drought victims in Mangistau and Turkestan oblasts. (2021). URL: https://kapital.kz/economic/97743/yes-vydelil-200-tysyach-yevropostradavshim-ot-zasukhi-v-mangistauskoy-i-turkestanskoy-oblastyakh.html (accessed: 11.08.2021).
Vose D. (2000). Risk Analysis: A Quantitative Guide, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, 430 p, https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2015.810051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2015.810051
Weersink A., Cabas J. H., and Olale E. (2010). Acreage Response to Weather, Yield, and Price. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 58, No. 1, pp. 57-72, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2009.01173.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2009.01173.x
World Trade Organization. Agreement on Agriculture, Annex 2. (1995). URL: http://fao.org (accessed: 11.09.2022).
Yasmin, T., El Refae, G. A., Eletter, S., & Kaba, A. (2022). Examining the total factor productivity changing patterns in Kazakhstan: An input-output analysis. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 9(6), 938-950. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i6.958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i6.958
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ainur Bulasheva, Talgat Kussaiynov, Sandugash Tokenova, Gulnara Mussina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.