The missing dimension of knowledge transfer from subsidiaries to headquarters: The case of Oil and Gas companies in CEE region

Authors

  • Emil Velinov University of Economics, Prague
  • Stefan Gueldenberg University of Liechtenstein

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v3i2.140

Keywords:

Top management team, Diversity, Company performance, Organization life cycle.

Abstract

The paper identifies knowledge management determinants of knowledge transfer from subsidiaries to headquarters in the top Oil & Gas companies in Central and Eastern Europe as their level of innovations, internationalization and economic importance are emerging. The paper sheds a light not only on the process of knowledge transfer parent-subsidiary but via versa as it is critical in the 21st century for better adapting to specific business needs in certain geographical regions. Thus, this reversed knowledge from subsidiaries to headquarters is critical for the given business sector where the level of innovation and amount of R&D investments are enormous. The study argues that the reversed process of knowledge transfers from subsidiary to parent company is positively related to company performance and business diversification. Nowadays the knowledge formed in the subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations (MNCs) is transferred to headquarters by investing in R&D centres, building new exploration and testing sites abroad. In the reversed knowledge transfer process we can identify main challenges, which are very critical to analyse and determine the exact process.

Author Biographies

Emil Velinov, University of Economics, Prague

Stefan Gueldenberg, University of Liechtenstein

References

Ambos, T. C., Ambos, B., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2006). Learning from foreign subsidiaries: An empirical investigation of headquarters' benefits from reverse knowledge transfers. International Business Review, 15(3), 294-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.01.002

Ambos, T. C., & Ambos, B. (2009). The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations. Journal of International Management, 15(1), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.02.002

Ambos, T.C., Ambos, B., Schlegelmilch, B.B., 2006. Learning from the Periphery: An

Empirical Investigation of Headquarters’ Benefits from Reverse Knowledge Transfers.

International Business Review 15 (3), 294-312

Bonache, J., & Brewster, C. (2001). Knowledge transfer and the management of expatriation. Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(1), 145-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6874(200101/02)43:1<145::AID-TIE9>3.0.CO;2-7

Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773-795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255638

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2002). Transferring knowledge in MNCs: The role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management, 8(1), 49-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1075-4253(01)00054-0

Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2004). Organizing knowledge processes in the multinational corporation: An introduction. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 340-349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400102

Berchtold, S., Pircher, R., & Stadler, C. (2010). Global integration versus local adaptation: a case study of Austrian MNCs in Eastern Europe. European Journal of International Management, 4(5), 524-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2010.034965

Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic management journal, 21(4), 473-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I

Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic management journal, 17(S2), 27-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105

Szulanski, G., & Jensen, R. J. (2006). Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10), 937-957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.551

Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of management journal, 44(5), 996-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443

Downloads

Published

2016-12-26

How to Cite

Velinov, E., & Gueldenberg, S. (2016). The missing dimension of knowledge transfer from subsidiaries to headquarters: The case of Oil and Gas companies in CEE region. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 3(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v3i2.140