Asymmetries in responses of commercial banks in a transitional economy to countercyclical monetary policy: The case of Romania
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v5i1.192Keywords:
Asymmetry, countercyclical monetary policy, commercial banks’ lending rate, Central Bank’s discount rate, commercial banks’ lending-Central Bank’s discount rate spread, time lag, RomaniaAbstract
The empirical results of this study reveal the following interesting characteristics of the Romanian banking sector over the December 1993 through August 2017 period. First, the spread between the lending-Central Bank’s discount rates was stable and adjusted to its long-run threshold asymmetrically. Second, lending institutions respond faster to contractionary than expansionary countercyclical monetary policy actions. This empirical finding suggests that Romanian commercial banks exhibit predatory rate setting behavior, which is consistent with those of their counterparts in advanced and emerging economies. Third, lending institutions respond to countercyclical monetary policy and the Romanian Central Bank authority effectively utilizes monetary policy to manage the economy as evidenced by the short-run dynamic and long-run Granger-causality from the discount rate to the banks’ lending rate. With respect to the time lags of the Romanian monetary policy found within the banking sector, the empirical results suggest that it takes almost two years for the lending rate to adjust to a monetary policy action completely.
References
Arak, M., Englander, S., and Tang, E. (1983). “Credit Cycles and the Pricing of the Prime Rate,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, 12-18.
Bernanke, S. B., and Gertler, M. (1995). “Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Instrument,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4). pp. 27-48.
Bernanke, B. S., and Blinder, A. (1992). “The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission,” American Economic Review, 82, pp. 901- 921.
Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., and Evans, C. (1994). “Identification and Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks, “Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Working Paper WP-94-7.
Calem, P.S., and Mester, L.J. (1995). “Consumer Behavior and the Stickiness of Credit-Card Interest Rate,” American Economic Review, 85(5). pp. 1327-1336.
Chan, K.S. (1993). “Consistency and Limiting Distribution of the Least Squares Estimator of a Threshold Autoregressive Model,” Annals of Statistics, 21(2). pp. 520-533.
Cook, T., and Hahn, T. (1989). “The Effect of Changes in the Federal Funds Rate Target on Market Interest Rates in the 1970s,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 24. pp. 331- 351.
Diebold, F.X., and Sharpe, S. A. (1990). “Post-Deregulation Bank-Deposit-Rate Pricing: The Multivariate Dynamics,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 8(3). pp. 281- 291.
Dueker, M.J. (2000). “Are Prime Rate Changes Asymmetric?” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Review, September/October. pp. 33-40.
Enders, W., and Granger, C.W.J. (1998). “Unit Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with an Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16(3). pp. 304-311.
Enders, W. & Siklos, P.L. (2001). “Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19(2), pp. 304-311.
Forbes, S.M., and Mayne, L. S. (1989). “A Friction Model of the Prime,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 13. pp. 127-135.
Friedman, M., and Schwartz, A. J. (1963). A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Frost, D., and Bowden, R. (1999). “An Asymmetry Generator for Error-Correction Mechanisms, with Application to Bank Mortgage-Rate Dynamics,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(2). pp. 253 - 263.
Gbosi, A. N. (2001). Contemporary Macroeconomic Problems and Stabilization Policies in Nigeria, Antovic Ventures, Port Harcourt.
Goldberg, M.A. (1984). “The Sensitivity of the Prime Rate to Money Market Conditions,” Journal of Financial Research, 7(4). pp. 269-280.
Hannan, T.H., and Berger, A. N. (1991). “The Rigidity of Prices: Evidence from the Banking Industry,” American Economic Review, 81(4). pp. 938 - 945.
Heffernan, S.A. (1997). “Modeling British Interest Rate Adjustment: An Error Correction Approach,” Economica, 64. pp. 211-231.
Hofmann, B., and Mizen, P. (2004). “Interest Rate Pass-Through and Monetary Transmission: Evidence from Individual Financial Institutions’ Retail Rates,” Economica, 71. pp. 99 - 123.
Hutchison, D.E. (1995). “Retail Bank Deposit Pricing: An Intertemporal Asset Pricing Approach,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 27. pp. 217-231.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, interest and Money. New York.
Levine, P., and Loeb, P. D. (1989). “Asymmetric Behavior of the Prime Rate of Interest,” American Economist, 33. pp. 34 - 38.
Meltzer, A. H. (1995). “Monetary, Credit (and Other) Transmission Processes: A Monetarist Perspective,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4). pp. 49-72.
Mester, L. J., and Saunders, A. (1995). “When Does the Prime Rate Change?” Journal of Banking and Finance, 19. pp. 743-764.
Mishkin, F. S. (1995). “Symposium on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4). pp. 3-10.
Moazzami, B. (1999). “Lending Rate Stickiness and Monetary Transmission Mechanism: The Case of Canada and the United States,” Applied Financial Economics, 9. pp. 533-538.
Neumark, D., and Sharpe, S. (1992). “Market Structure and the Nature of Price Rigidity: Evidence from the Market for Consumer Deposits,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2). pp. 657-680.
Nguyen, C., and Islam, A. (2010). “Asymmetries in the Thai lending-deposit rate Spread: an econometric analysis,” Applied Economics Letters, 17(13). pp. 1229-1236.
Nguyen, Chu V. (2015). “The Vietnamese Lending Rate, Policy Related Rate, and Monetary Policy Post 1997 Asian Financial Crisis,” Cogent-Economics & Finance, Vol. 3(1), Routledge-Taylor & Francis Group. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23322039.2015.1007808.
Miclaus, C. (2008). “Brief History,” Banca Nationala A Romaniei.
http://www.bnr.ro/Brief-History-of-the-NBR-2730.aspx; or https://www.ibuzzle.com/articles/economy-the-national-bank-of-romania.html
Obstfeld, M., and Rogoff, K. (1995). “The Mirage of Fixed Exchange Rates,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4). pp. 73-96.
Perron, P. (1997). “Further Evidence on Breaking Trend Functions in Macroeconomic Variables,” Journal of Econometrics, 80. pp. 355-385.
Preda, G. (2014). “Features of the Romanian Financial System Regarding the Interest Rate Transmission,” Revista Economic?, 66(6), pp. 87-96. http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/66606preda.pdf
Romer, C., and Romer, D. (1990). “New Evidence on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism,” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1. pp. 149 - 214.
Rosen, R.J. (2002). “What Goes Up Must Come Down? Asymmetries and Persistence in Bank Deposit Rates,” Journal of Financial Services Research, 21(3). pp. 173-193.
Sarno, L., and Thornton, D. L. (2003). “The Dynamic Relationship between the Federal Funds Rate and the Treasury Bill Rate: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 27. pp. 1079-1110.
Scholnick, B. (1999). “Interest Rate Asymmetries in Long-Term Loan and Deposit Markets,” Journal of Financial Services Research, 16. pp. 5-26.
Sellon, G.H. (2002). “The Changing U.S. Financial System: Some Implications for the Monetary Transmission Mechanism,” Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, First Quarter. pp. 5-35.
Stiglitz, J.E., and Weiss, A. (1981). “Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information,” American Economic Review, 71(3). pp. 393-410.
Taylor. J. B. (1995). “The Monetary Transmission Mechanism: An Empirical Framework,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4). pp. 11-26.
Thompson, M.A. (2006). “Asymmetric Adjustment in the Prime Lending-Deposit Rate Spread,” Review of Financial Economics, 15(4). pp. 323-329.
Tkacz, G. (2001). “Endogenous Thresholds and Tests of Asymmetry in U.S. Prime Rate Movements,” Economic Letters, 73, pp. 207-211.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The JEECAR journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright and publishing rights of their own manuscript without restrictions.
This journal applies the Creative Attribution Common License to works we publish, and allows reuse and remixing of its content, in accordance with a CC-BY 4.0 license.
Authors are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — The author may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
The JEECAR Journal is committed to the editorial principles of all aspects of publication ethics and publication malpractice as assigned by the Committee on Public Ethics.