Latvian municipal budget expenditures on transport infrastructure and production in the context of improving the local economy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v11i4.1608

Keywords:

Transport infrastructure, Production, Municipal budgets, Local economy, Statistical analysis, Latvia

Abstract

The article aims to study Latvian municipal budget expenditures on transport infrastructure and production in the context of improving the local economy. The authors hypothesize that the comparative priority of municipal budget expenditures on two items is determined by the state of the local economy; in municipalities with a more developed economy it is ‘transport’ rather than ‘production’ budget expenses that are more likely to improve the local economy, and in municipalities with a less developed economy – vice versa. The authors tested the hypothesis based on data for 2021 and 2022 (the time after the reform of the territorial-administrative structure of Latvia) for 43 Latvian municipalities using various methods of statistical analysis. The results show that the comparative priorities in Latvian municipal budget expenditures are determined not by the state of the local economy, but rather by the geographical (or geopolitical/geoeconomical) location of the municipality. As a result of this, Latvian municipalities are grouped into territorial clusters, using the agglomeration effect from the concentration of transport infrastructure or production. Over the past year, there has been a tendency towards ‘transport-production’ economic restructuring of the territory of Latvia, the reasons for which may be geopolitical situation in the Eastern Europe.

Author Biographies

Vera Komarova, Daugavpils University, Latvia

Dr. Vera Komarova is the leading researcher in the Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at the Department of Economics of Daugavpils University, Latvia.  She has the status of an expert on the Latvian  Council of Sciences in the fields of economics and entrepreneurship, sociology, and research interests: social stratification, regional economics, economic terminology, socio-economic development, and research methodology.

Svetlana Ignatjeva, Daugavpils University, Latvia

Svetlana Ignatjeva, Doctor of Physical Science, is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Environment and Technologies of the Faculty of Natural Sciences and Healthcare of Daugavpils University, Latvia.

Janis Kudins, Daugavpils University, Latvia

Janis Kudins holds a Ph.D. in Social Sciences and is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Economics of Daugavpils University, Latvia.

Anita Kokarevica, Riga Stradinsh University, Latvia

Anita Kokarevica holds a Ph.D. in Economics and Business and is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Public Health and Epidemiology of the Faculty of Public Health and Social Welfare of Riga Stradinsh University, Latvia.

Inta Ostrovska, Daugavpils University, Latvia

Inta Ostrovska, Dr. Paed., Assistant Professor at the Department of Economics of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of Daugavpils University, Latvia.

Edmunds Čižo, Daugavpils University, Latvia

Edmunds Čižo holds PhD in Economics and Business and is an Assistant professor at the Department of Economics of Daugavpils University, Latvia.

References

Aschauer, D. (1990). Highway capacity and economic growth. Economic Perspectives, 14, 14–24.

Boruch, A. (2014). Development of transport infrastructure and economic growth of Latvia. Proceedings of the 53rd International Scientific Conference of Daugavpils University. Available at: https://dukonference.lv/files/proceedings_of_conf/53konf/ekonomika/Boruch.pdf

Cabinet of Ministers of Latvia. (2014). The order in which personal income tax, tax-related late fees and fines are transferred to the budget. Latvijas Vēstnesis=Bulletin of Latvia, 255, 23.12. Available at: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/271196-kartiba-kada-iedzivotaju-ienakuma-nodokli-ar-nodokli-saistito-nokavejuma-naudu-un-soda-naudu-ieskaita-budzeta (In Latv.).

Capello, R. (2009). Regional growth and local development theories: conceptual evolution over fifty years of regional science. Géographie, économie, société, 11(1), 9–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3166/ges.11.9-21

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2023). Table IRS031. Population at the beginning of the year, its changes and the main indicators of natural movement in regions, cities and counties (after the administrative territorial reform in 2020) 2021 – 2023. Statistics Database. Available at: https://data.stat.gov.lv/pxweb/lv/OSP_PUB/START__POP__IR__IRS/IRS031

Cigu, E., Agheorghiesei, D., Gavriluta, A., & Toader, E. (2019). Transport infrastructure development, public performance and long-run economic growth: a case study for the EU-28 countries. Sustainability, 11(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010067

Daily Business. (2022). Ventspils – a City for Business and Education. Available at: https://www.diena.lv/raksts/citi/reklamraksti/ventspils-pilseta-uznemejdarbibai-un-izglitibai-14286660 (In Latv.).

Department of External Communication of Riga City Council. (2023). The Priorities of the Budget for the Reorganization of Riga's Economy for 2023 are Street Renovation, Social Support and Education. Available at: https://www.riga.lv/lv/jaunums/rigas-saimniecibas-sakartosanas-budzeta-2023-gadam-prioritates-ielu-atjaunosana-socialais-atbalsts-un-izglitiba?utm_source=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F (In Latv.).

Dwight Hines, J. (2011). The post-industrial regime of production/consumption and the rural gentrification of the New West Archipelago. Antipode, 44(1), 74–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00843.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00843.x

Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. (2002). Economics of Agglomeration – Cities, Industrial Location and Regional Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805660 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805660

Garofoli, G. (1993). Economic development, organization of production and territory. Revue d'économie industrielle, 64, 22–37. https://doi.org/10.3406/rei.1993.1475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/rei.1993.1475

Gherghina, S., Onofrei, M., Vintila, G., & Armeanu, D. (2018). Empirical evidence from EU-28 countries on resilient transport infrastructure systems and sustainable economic growth. Sustainability, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082900

GovPilot. (2023). How Municipalities Can Drive Local Economic Development. Available at: https://www.govpilot.com/blog/municipality-led-local-economic-development

Kastolani, W., Warlina, L., Luckyardi, S., Oktafiani, D., & Meyer, D. F. (2022). Improving local economy through integrated waste management in Bandung city, Indonesia (Case study of Sukasari district). Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 9(5), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i5.1064 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i5.1064

Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Linton, C., Grant-Muller, S., & Gale, W. F. (2015). Approaches and techniques for modelling CO2 emissions from road transport. Transportation Review, 35, 533–553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1030004

Melo, P., Graham, D., & Brage-Ardao, R. (2013). The productivity of transport infrastructure investment: a meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(5), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2013.05.002

Meyer, D. F. (2019). A quantitative assessment of the impact of government activities on the economy of Poland. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 6(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v6i2.338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v6i2.338

Munnell, A. (1992). Policy watch: infrastructure investment and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.6.4.189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.6.4.189

Niedole, I., & Averyanov, D. (2011). The role of transport infrastructure development in use. Sustainable Spatial Development, 3, 20–25. Available at: https://ortus.rtu.lv/science/lv/publications/12593 (In Latv.).

Popov, A. A., Karataeva, T. A., Danilova, E. V., Myreev, A. N., & Sergeeva, V. V. (2022). Diversification as a factor in the efficient economic development of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Russia. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 9(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i2.915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v9i2.915

Prus, P., & Sikora, M. (2021). The impact of transport infrastructure on the sustainable development of the region – case study. Agriculture, 11, 279. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040279 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040279

Saeima of Latvia. (2020). Law on administrative territories and populated areas. Latvijas Vēstnesis=Bulletin of Latvia, 119C, 22.06. https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/315654

Seers, D. (1969). The meaning of development. International Development Review, 11(4), 3–4.

Semin, A. (2021). Impact of peat industry development on regional sustainability. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 8(2), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i2.694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v8i2.694

State Treasury of Latvia. (2023). Basic Budget Implementation Report (2PB_Pasv). Available at: https://e2.kase.gov.lv/pub5.5_pasv/code/pub.php?module=pub (In Latv.).

Sun, C. W., Luo, Y., & Li, J. L. (2018). Urban traffic infrastructure investment and air pollution: Evidence from the 83 cities in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172(1), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.194

Voronov, V. (2023). Differences in the management of socio-economic development in the Baltic states: levels, approaches and models. International Research Journal, 135(9). https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2023.135.31

Wang, L., Xue, X., Zhao, Z., & Wang, Z. (2018). The impacts of transportation infrastructure on sustainable development: emerging trends and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061172 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061172

Yong, L. (2021). Why industrial development matters now more than ever before. Industrial Analytics Platform. Available at: https://iap.unido.org/articles/why-industrial-development-matters-now-more-ever

Zhang, B., & Qi, R. (2021). Transportation infrastructure, innovation capability, and urban economic development. Transformations in Business & Economics, 20(3C(54C)), 526–545.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-03

How to Cite

Komarova, V., Ignatjeva, S., Kudins, J., Kokarevica, A., Ostrovska, I., & Čižo, E. (2024). Latvian municipal budget expenditures on transport infrastructure and production in the context of improving the local economy. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 11(4), 736–753. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v11i4.1608