The Role of Collective Identities in Democratization Processes. The Case of the European Union and Southeast Asia

Authors

  • Georgia Giannakarou University of Cambridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v2i1.85

Keywords:

“liminal situation”, transition, collective identities, total social fact, multiple identities, “electoral” democracy, consolidating democracy, ethnic consciousness.

Abstract

In this essay, I examine the role of collective identities in democratization processes in Europe and East and Southeast Asia. This study contributes to the latest academic “neorealist-liberal debate” and constructivist theories, by emphasizing a crucial acknowledgement. With the exception of the case of the European Union, which boasts the only peaceful democratization process in the post-war era, in East and Southeast Asia there is strong evidence that the orthodoxy of democratization processes is going to take place. This means that in this vast area, democratization processes will be long-lasting social constructions mixed with strong ethnic consciousness, and therefore, not so peaceful but rather violent processes.  

Author Biography

Georgia Giannakarou, University of Cambridge

UNESCO Pireaus, Director of Foreign Languages Dept.

References

Appudurai, A. (2007), “Hope and Democracy”, Public Culture, 19(1), 29-34.

Berman, S. (2007), “The Vain Hope for ‘Correct’ Timing”, Journal of Democracy, 18(3), 14-17.

Carothers, T. (2002), “The End of the Transition Paradigm”, Journal of Democracy, 13(1), (January 2002), 5-21.

Carothers, T. (2007a), ”How Democracies Emerge: The Sequencing Fallacy”, Journal of Democracy, vol. 18 (1), 12-27.

Carothers, T. (2007b), “A Quarter-Century of Promoting Democracy”, Journal of Democracy, 18(4) (October 2007), 112-115.

Calhoun, C. (2007), “Nationalism and Cultures of Democracy”, Public Culture, 19(1), 151-173.

Castells, M. (2000), “The Construction of European Identity. Statement prepared for the European Presidency of the European Union” in The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chakrabarty, D. (2007), “In the Name of Politics: Democracy and the Power of the Multitude in India”, Public Culture, 19(1), 35-57.

Dahl, R.A. (1942), Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New York: Harper.

Diamond, L. (1997), “Is the Third Wave of Democratization Over? An empirical assessment”, Working Paper 236, March 1997, The Hellen Kellogg Institute for International Studies, 1-49.

Eriksen, E.O., Fossum, J.E. (2008), “Reconstituting European Democracy”, Arena, Working Paper No 01, January 2008, 1-42.

Fearon, D. J. and Laitin, D. D (2000), “Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity”, International Organization, 54(4) (Autumn 2000), 845-877.

Featherstone, K. (1994), “Jean Monnet and the 'Democratic Deficit' in the European Union’”, Journal of Common Market Studies (JCMS), 32 (2) (June 1994), 149-170.

Follesdal, A., Hix, S. (2006), “Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik”, JCMS 2006, 44(3), 533-562.

Fukuyama, F. (2011), “US democracy has little to teach China”, The Financial Times, January 17, 2011, Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cb6af6e8-2272-11e0-b6a2-00144feab49a,_i_email=y.html. Also at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/cb6af6e8-2272-11e0-b6a2-00144feab49a.html#axzz1JZGlgvqd

Gellner, E. (1983), Nations and Nationalism. London: Basil Blackwell.

Gunther, R., Diamandouros, P.N. and Puhle, H-J., “O’ Donnell’s Illusions’: A Rejoinder”, Journal of Democracy, 7 (October 1996), 151-159.

Henders, S.J. (ed.) (2004), Democratization and Identity: Regimes and Ethnicity in East and Southeast Asia. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

Huntington, P. S. (1993a), The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

Huntington, P. S. (1993b), “The Clash of Civilizations?”, Foreign Affairs, 72(3), Summer 1993, 22-49.

Keane, J. (2009), The Life and Death of Democracy. London/New York/Sydney/Toronto: Simon & Schuster.

Kopecky, P., Mudde, C. (2000), “What has Eastern Europe taught us about the democratisation literature (and vice versa)?", European Journal of Political Research, 37, 517-539.

Majone, G. (1998), “Europe’s ‘Democratic Deficit’: The Question of Standards”, European Law Journal, 4(1) (March 1998), 5-28.

Markoff, J. (1999), “Our ‘common home’ – but who owns the house?”, in Smith, D. and Wright, S., Whose Europe? The Turn Towards Democracy. Oxford: Blackwell, 21-47.

Moravcsik, A. (2002), “In Defense of the ‘Democratic Deficit’: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union”, JCMS, 40 (4), 603-624.

Moravcsik, A. (2010), “Affirming Democracy in International Organizations”, in Joshua Goldstein and Jon Pevehouse, Global Challenges in 2030, (1.4.2010), 13-14, (and in the forthcoming issue of International Relations Magazine). Also in http://www.princeton.edu/~amoravcs/library/goldstein.pdf

O’ Donnell, G. (1996), “Illusions about Consolidation”, Journal of Democracy, 7 (April 1996), 34-51.

Offe, C., Preuss, U. (2006), “The Problem of Legitimacy in the European Polity. Is Democratization the Answer?”, Constitutional Webpapers ConWeb No 6/2006, available at www.bath.ac.uk/esml/conWEB

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1994), The Revolt of the Masses. New York: Norton [first English publication 1932, first Spanish publication 1930].

Piris, J.-C. (2010), The Lisbon Treaty. A Legal and Political Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schedler, A. (1998), "What Is Democratic Consolidation?", Journal of Democracy 9(2), 91-107.

Schmitter, P. and Karl, T.L. (1991), “What Democracy Is …and Is Not”, Journal of Democracy, 2(3) (Summer 1991), 75-88.

Schmitter, P. and Karl, T.L. (1996), “What Democracy Is …and Is Not”, in Diamond, L. and Plattner, M. (eds.), The Global Resurgence of Democracy, 2nd edition. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 49-62.

Schumpeter, J. (2003), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Routledge.

Sen, A. (1999), Development as Freedom. Oxford: OUP.

USAID (1998), Handbook of Democracy and Governance Program Indicators. Washington DC: USAID.

Wendt, A. (1994), “Collective Identity Formation and the International State”, American Political Science Review, 68(2), 384-396.

Whitehead, L. (2002), Democratisation: Theory and Experience. Oxford: OUP.

Wydra, H. (2007), Communism and the Emergence of Democracy. Cambridge: CUP.

Wydra, H. (2008), “Democratisation as Meaning-Formation – Insights from the Communist Experience”, International Political Anthropology 1(1), 113-132.

Wydra, H. (2009), “The Liminal Origins of Democracy”, International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 91-109.

Wydra, H. (2010), “Emerging Democracies”, in Kurian, G. (ed.) (2010), The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Washington DC: CQ Press, 496-498.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-25

How to Cite

Giannakarou, G. (2015). The Role of Collective Identities in Democratization Processes. The Case of the European Union and Southeast Asia. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v2i1.85