Political and Economic Decisions and Competition – What is the Efficient Antimonopoly Policy?

Irakli Lekvinadze


This article discusses the influence of economic decisions which affect the antitrust and competition support policies. Many countries provide governmental initiatives for improving antirust legislation. There is an effort to develop efficient legislation, to define market boundaries, to identify dominating companies, and to prevent cartel development. A review of the literature has shown that refined legislation does not work. Qualified and non-politicized economic decisions are required to provide fair and equitable competition in the marketplace. The discussions of various researchers are profiled on the economic issues. This article analyzes The Republic of Georgia’s 20 year unique market experiences in Eastern Europe. Recommendations have been proposed to increase the effectiveness of an anti-monopoly policy.


Competition, Georgia, Antimonopoly Policy, Communications Market, Insurance Market


Friedman. M. (1982). Friedman, Milton & Rose D. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press.

Heyne. P., Boettke, P., and Prychitko, D. (2009). The Economic Way of Thinking, 12th ed.

Massimo, M. (2004). Competition policy: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.







Papava V. Competition is necessary. Personal communication, N. Kvlividze, n.d.

The Georgian antimonopoly service report for 2004.

The Georgian law on consumer rights protection. March 20, 1996 (#151).

The Georgian law on free trade and competition. June 3, 2005 (#1550).

The Georgian law on monopolistic activity and competition. June 25, 1996 (#288).

The “Kviris Palitra” Newspaper, No.18 (635). April 30 – May 6, 2007 (in Georgian).

World Economic Forum - The Global Competitiveness Report 2013 – 2014.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

The IEECA Press

ISSN 2328-8272 (print)   ISSN 2328-8280 (online)