The Russian Landing Rate, Central Bank’s Policy Related Rate and Intermediation Premium

Chu V. Nguyen, Caroline LeBon, Stephen Miller, Cynthia B. Lloyd

Abstract


This paper illustrates asymmetries in the Russian intermediation premium as measured by the spread between the commercial lending rate and the Central Bank’s policy related rate. Empirical results have shown that the Russian intermediation premium adjusts to the threshold faster when the Central Bank’s policy related rates increase relative to lending rates as opposed to when the Central Bank’s policy related rates move in the opposite direction. The findings of this paper suggest that during the period when the Russian Federation faced formidable challenges from a sharp decline in oil prices and reduced access to international capital markets due to Western sanctions, the Central Bank of Russia was not effective in utilizing countercyclical monetary policy to achieve macroeconomic objectives and commercial banks exhibited predatory pricing behavior.


References


Breitung, J. (2001). Rank Tests for Nonlinear Cointegration. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 19, 331-340.

Calem, P., & Mester, L. (1995). Consumer behavior and the stickiness of credit-card interest rates. The American Economic Review, 85 (5), 1327-1336.

Chan, K. (1993). Consistency and Limiting Distribution of the Least Squares Estimator of a Threshold Autoregressive Model. Annals of Statistics, 21 (2), 520-533.

Chang, H.L., & Su, C.W. (2010). The Lending-Central Bank’s policy related Rate Relationship in Eastern European Countries: Evidence from the Rank Test for Nonlinear Cointegration. Czech Journal of Economics and Finance, 60(6), 534-544.

Dueker, M.J. (2000). Are Prime Rate Changes Asymmetric? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Review, September/October, 33-40.

Enders, W., & Granger, C. (1998). Unit Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with an Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16(3), 304-311.

Enders, W., & Siklos, P. (2001). Cointegration and Threshold Adjustment. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19(2), 304-311.

Frost, D., & Bowden, R. (1999). An Asymmetry Generator for Error-Correction Mechanisms, with Application to Bank Mortgage-Rate Dynamics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(2), 253-263.

Gustavo A., Alvarez, H., & Makunin. I. (2016). Russia Industry Research – Banks. Rating-Agentur Expert RA GmbH, Walter-Kolb-Strasse 9-11, (August 26, 2016), Germany. raexpert.eu/files/Industry_report-Banks_26.08.2016.pdf

Hannan, T., & Berger, A. (1991). The Rigidity of Prices: Evidence from the Banking Industry. American Economic Review, 81(4), 938-945.

Haug, A., & Basher, S. (2011). Linear or nonlinear cointegration in the purchasing power parity relationship? Applied Economics, 43, 185-196.

Ho, A., & Baxter, A. (2011). Banking Reform in Vietnam. Asia Focus, Country Analysis Unit, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, USA.

Hofmann, B., & Mizen, P. (2004). Interest Rate Pass-Through and Monetary Transmission: Evidence from Individual Financial Institutions’ Retail Rates. Economica, 71, 99-123.

Hutchison, D. (1995). Retail Bank Central Bank’s policy related Pricing: An Intertemporal Asset Pricing Approach. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. 27(1), 217 - 231.

IMF (2016-a) Russian Federation Financial System Stability Assessment. IMF Country Report No. 16/231, (July 2016), Washington, D.C., USA.

IMF. (2016-b). Russian Federation Financial System Stability Assessment Program: Detailed Assessment of Observation Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision. IMF Country Report No. 16/303, (September 2016), Washington, D.C., USA.

McKinnon, R.I. (1973). Money and Capital in Economic Development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

Neumark, D., & Sharpe, S. (1992). Market Structure and the Nature of Price Rigidity: Evidence from the Market for Consumer Deposits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 657-680.

Nguyen, C. V., Pointer, L. & Smith, C. (2008). The Asymmetric Behavior of the Mexican Banking Interest Rate Margin. Journal of Business and Economics Perspectives, 34(2), Fall/Winter, 57-67.

Nguyen, C. V., & Anisul M. Islam, A.M. (2010). Asymmetries in the Thai Lending-Central Bank’s policy related Rate Spread: An Econometric Analysis. Applied Economic Letters, 17(13), 1229-1236.

Nguyen, C. V., & Henney, S.M. (2013). Behavior of the US Mortgage Market Following the Deregulation of 1980. Journal of Business Issues, 4(1), 53-64.

Patrick, H.T. (1966). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Underdeveloped Countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 14(2), 174-189.

Perron, P. (1997). Further Evidence on Breaking Trend Functions in Macroeconomic Variables. Journal of Econometrics, 80(2), 355-385.

Rosen, R. (2002). What Goes Up Must Come Down? Asymmetries and Persistence in Bank Central Bank’s policy related Rates. Journal of Financial Services Research, 21(3), 173-193.

Sarno, L., & Thornton, D. L. (2003). The Dynamic Relationship between the Federal Funds Rate and the Treasury Bill Rate: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 1079-1110.

Scholnick, B. (1999). Interest Rate Asymmetries in Long-Term Loan and Central Bank’s policy related Markets. Journal of Financial Services Research, 16, 5-26.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1912). TheoriederWirtschaftlichenEntwicklung, Liepzig: Duncker and Humblot’. Revised English translation by Redvers Opie, ‘The Theory of Economic Development’ Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.

Stiglitz, J., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393-410.

Thompson, M. (2006). Asymmetric Adjustment in the Prime Lending-Central Bank’s policy related Rate Spread. Review of Financial Economics, 15(4), 323-329.

Thompson Reuters (2015) Banks’ Annual Report 2015. https://annual-report.thomsonreuters.com

Tkacz, G. (2001). Endogenous Thresholds and Tests of Asymmetry in U.S. Prime Rate Movements. Economics Letters, 73, 207-211.


Full Text: Article.PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

The IEECA Press

ISSN 2328-8272 (print)   ISSN 2328-8280 (online)